Affiliation:
1. Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg , Alexanderstraße 1, 20099 Hamburg , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
Studies indicate positive effects of interprofessional collaboration on the quality of health care. Interprofessional academic education of health care professionals is crucial for successful cooperation, although Terizakis & Gehring (2014, p. 24) state «a genuine understanding of interprofessional teaching […] hasn't developed yet.» The undefined usage of terminology and coexisting interprofessional study programs are only one part of the problem. Further consented interprofessional learning concepts and systematic knowledge regarding competencies and teaching experiences are lacking. The WHO (2010, pp. 27 f) recommends lecturers to generate a common understanding of interprofessionality. At Hamburg University of Applied Sciences a part-time study program in interprofessional health care and management started in September 2015. It was designed as a continuing education program for occupational-, physio-, and speech therapists, nurses and midwives. As a preparation for the program focus group discussions with staff members of the department „Pfege & Management» were conducted. The aim was to investigate their understanding of interprofessionality, learning and teaching. The results indicated a contextual understanding of interprofessionality, although the usage of the terminology remains blurred. The tension of a congruent interprofessional learning concept is to enhance scientific reflection of disciplines, as well as strengthening interprofessional aspects. Regarding the change in demands of the health care system, interprofessional collaboration is seen as a major resource. The research gap on disciplinary orientations in terms of enhancing professional identity on the one and interprofessionality as innovative construct on the other hand has to be filled.
Reference25 articles.
1. Balsinger, Ph. (1996). Ökologie und Interdisziplinarität – eine Beziehung der Zukunft?. Berlin: Birkhäuser.
2. Bauer, R. & Wesenauer, A. (2015). Zukunftsmotor Gesundheit – Entwürfe für das Gesundheitssystem von morgen. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
3. Bohnsack, R. (2000). Gruppendiskussion. In: Flick, U./Kardorff, E.v./Steinke, I. (Hg.): Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch. Reinbek b. Hamburg: rororo. 369-384.
4. Bollinger, H. & Gerlach, A. (2015). Profession und Professionalisierung im Gesundheitswesen Deutschlands – zur Reifikation soziologischer Kategorien. In: Pundt, J. & Kälble, K. (2015). Gesundheitsberufe und gesundheitsberufliche Bildungskonzepte. Bremen: APOLLON University Press.
5. Dilcher, B. & Hammerschlag, L. (2013). Klinikalltag und Arbeitszufriedenheit. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献