Evaluation laboratory prenatal screening performance based on biological variation of risk assessment in second trimester in China
Author:
He Falin1, Zhong Kun1, Yuan Shuai1, Du Yuxuan1, Wang Wei1, Wang Zhiguo1
Affiliation:
1. National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Hospital/National Center of Gerontology , Beijing , P.R. China
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
This study intends to evaluate prenatal screening risk assessment performance based on biological variation to help clinical laboratories realize their own screening performance and set the appropriate performance specifications for prenatal screening risk assessment in China.
Methods
Fifteen samples with detailed clinical information were distributed to participants and the prenatal screening Down syndrome risk assessment of each sample were submitted. Three levels of performance specification (optimum, desirable, minimum) derived from biological variation were used to evaluate laboratory prenatal screening risk assessment performance.
Results
A total of 797 laboratories participated in the survey project. There are 216 laboratories using serological double-marker test and 581 laboratories using serological triple-marker test. For each screening protocol, more than 92.00% laboratories meet minimum performance specifications, more than 84.00% laboratories meet desirable performance specifications, and only about 62.50%laboratories meet optimum performance specifications. The Feltz and Miller test indicated that there were no significant statistical differences in the RCV for double-marker screening in 5 platforms and triple-marker screening in 6 platforms.
Conclusions
The risk assessment of prenatal screening in the second trimester in China can be improved further. It is appropriate to choose desirable performance specifications for external quality assurance organizations to evaluate the risk assessment performance.
Funder
The National Key Research and Development Program of China
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics
Reference19 articles.
1. Cuckle, H. Rethinking second-trimester Down-syndrome screening in the cell-free DNA era. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019;54:431–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20360. 2. Miao, ZY, Liu, X, Shi, TK, Xu, Y, Song, QH, Tang, SH. First trimester, second trimester, and integrated screening for Down’s syndrome in China. J Med Screen 2012;19:68–71. https://doi.org/10.1258/jms.2012.011145. 3. Wald, NJ, Cuckle, HS, Densem, JW, Nanchahal, K, Royston, P, Chard, T, et al.. Maternal serum screening for Down’s syndrome in early pregnancy. BMJ 1988;297:883–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.297.6653.883. 4. Huang, T, Meschino, WS, Okun, N, Dennis, A, Hoffman, B, Lepage, N, et al.. The impact of maternal weight discrepancies on prenatal screening results for Down syndrome. Prenat Diagn 2013;33:471–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4090. 5. Wan, X, Wen, J, Song, X, Guo, Y, Liu, X, Yang, B, et al.. The analysis of second-trimester triple screening for Down syndrome in Chinese normal singleton pregnancies. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2012;72:642–7. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365513.2012.729858.
|
|