Investigation of the rapid immunochromatographic test performance in the diagnosis of syphilis; comparison of four serological methods
Author:
Terzi Huseyin Agah1, Aydemir Ozlem1, Karakece Engin1, Hatipoglu Huseyin2, Olmez Mehmet2, Koroglu Mehmet2, Altindis Mustafa2
Affiliation:
1. Department of Microbiology , Sakarya University, Research/Training Hospital , Sakarya , Turkey 2. Department of Microbiology , School of Medicine, Sakarya University , Sakarya , Turkey
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To test the performance of the newly available rapid test for syphilis, we compared it with Treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay (TPHA). Additionally, we investigated the performance of rapid plasma reagin (RPR) and chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassays (CMIA) at our laboratory using TPHA as a gold standard.
Methods
The serum samples of 595 patients with the pre-diagnosis of syphilis were studied by four serological methods. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of RPR, CMIA, and syphilis rapid test were assessed by utilizing TPHA as a gold standard for the diagnosis of syphilis.
Results
Of the patients, 6.2% (37/595) had positive RPR, 5.5% (33/595) had positive CMIA, 5.5% (33/595) had a positive rapid immunochromatographic method and 5% (30/595) had positive TPHA. When TPHA results were taken as the reference, the sensitivity of the rapid test for syphilis was 100%, the specificity was 99.5%, PPV was 90.9%, and NPV was 100.0%.
Conclusions
It was observed that the rapid test for syphilis used in the study was quite successful, its cost was appropriate, and the test was very fast and easy to apply. At the same time, the agreement between syphilis rapid test and TPHA was found to be excellent.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry, medical,Clinical Biochemistry,Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics
Reference35 articles.
1. Tramont, EC. Treponema pallidum (syphilis). In: Mandell, GL, Bennett, JE, Dolin, R, editors. Principles and practice of infectious diseases, 7th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2010:3035–55 pp. 2. Newman, L, Rowley, J, Vander Hoorn, S, Wijesooriya, NS, Unemo, M, Low, N, et al. Global estimates of the prevalence and incidence of four curable sexually transmitted infections in 2012 based on systematic review and global reporting. PLoS One 2015;10:e0143304. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143304. 3. Wijesooriya, NS, Rochat, RW, Kamb, ML, Turlapati, P, Temmerman, M, Broutet, N, et al. Global burden of maternal and congenital syphilis in 2008 and 2012: a health systems modelling study. Lancet Glob Health 2016;4:e525–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(16)30135-8. 4. Luger, AF. Serological diagnosis of syphilis: current methods. In: Young, H, McMillan, A, editors. Immunological diagnosis of sexually transmitted diseases. New York: Dekker; 1988:250–9 pp. 5. Fischbach, FT. Syphilis detection tests. In: A manual of laboratory & diagnostic tests, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2000:581–3 pp.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|