Evaluation of a faecal calprotectin method using the OC-SENSOR PLEDIA

Author:

O’Driscoll Shane1ORCID,Piggott Carolyn1ORCID,Benton Sally C.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Southern Hub , Royal Surrey County Hospital , Guildford , UK

2. Berkshire and Surrey Pathology Services , Royal Surrey County Hospital , Guildford , UK

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommends faecal calprotectin (f-cal) to help differentiate inflammatory bowel diseases from irritable bowel syndrome. Faecal samples for calprotectin have historically been collected at home by patients into screw-top pots and sent to laboratories where calprotectin is extracted and analysed. Faecal haemoglobin (f-Hb) samples are collected at home into specific collection devices containing stabilising buffer. We evaluated the OC-FCa method for f-cal, developed by Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd. (Japan) that uses the same collection device and analyser as f-Hb. Methods OC-FCa was assessed for limit of blank (LOB), limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), within and between-run imprecision, linearity, prozone, recovery and carryover. A method comparison against the BÜHLMANN fCAL® turbo (BÜHLMANN Laboratories AG, Switzerland) was performed using patient samples and EQA. Results The LOB was 3 µg calprotectin/g faeces (µg/g), LOD 8 μg/g and LOQ 20 μg/g. Within and between-run imprecision was <5%; linearity was good (R2 > 0.99); prozone was appropriately detected; recovery was 99.6%; no observed carryover. OC-FCa showed a strong positive bias compared with BÜHLMANN fCAL® turbo (Z=−5.3587, p < 0.001). When categorised using our local pathway, which interprets calprotectin concentrations and need for further investigation, Cohen’s Kappa demonstrates substantial agreement at <50 μg/g (κ=0.80) and >150 μg/g (κ=0.63) and fair agreement (κ=0.22) in the borderline category 50–150 μg/g. Conclusions The OC-FCa method performed well in the evaluation. With the lack of standardisation for f-cal a clinical study is required to evaluate the positive bias and establish suitable cut-off levels.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

Reference14 articles.

1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Faecal calprotectin diagnostic tests for inflammatory diseases of the bowel. DG 11. London: NICE; 2013. [Online]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/dg11 [Accessed 16 August 2021].

2. BÜHLMANN Laboratories, Switzerland. BÜHLMANN Instruction for use CALEX® Cap, 2020. Available from: https://buhlmannlabs.com/wp-content/uploads/B-CALEX-C50-C200-C500-IFU-FDA-VA2-2020-04-29.pdf [Accessed 09 Mar 2022].

3. Eiken Chemical, Co., Ltd. OC-auto sampling bottle 3, 2020. [Online]. Available from: https://www.eiken.co.jp/en/products/fit/sampling_bottles/ [Accessed 16 Dec 2021].

4. Armbruster, DA, Pry, T. Limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantitation. Clin Biochem Rev 2008;29:S49–52.

5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Evaluation of precision performance of quantitative measurement methods, 3rd ed. EP05-A3 Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2014.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Sample comparison of BÜHLMANN fCAL Turbo and OC-FCa faecal calprotectin methods;Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine;2024-08-14

2. Cross-sectional evaluation of online direct-to-public calprotectin testing;Frontline Gastroenterology;2024-06-26

3. Comparison of faecal calprotectin using two collection and extraction strategies for the BÜHLMANN CALEX® Cap – possible implications for clinical cut-offs?;Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine;2023-02-21

4. Clinical evaluation of the OC-Sensor Pledia calprotectin assay;Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM);2022-09-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3