An observational study of pain self-management strategies and outcomes: does type of pain, age, or gender, matter?
Author:
Slack Marion K.1, Chavez Ramon2, Trinh Daniel2, de Dios Daniel Vergel2, Lee Jeannie2
Affiliation:
1. Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science , University of Arizona , 1295 N. Martin, P.O. Box 210202 , Tucson, Pima County, AZ 85721 , USA , Phone: +520.626.1099 2. Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science , University of Arizona , Tucson, Pima County, AZ , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Background and aims
Acute pain is differentiated from chronic pain by its sudden onset and short duration; in contrast, chronic pain is characterized by a duration of at least several months, typically considered longer than normal healing time. Despite differences in definition, there is little information on how types of self-management strategies or outcomes differ when pain is chronic rather than acute. Additionally, age and gender are thought to be related to types of strategies used and outcomes. However, strategies used and outcomes can be influenced by level of education, socioeconomic status, occupation, and access to the health care system, which can confound associations to type of pain, age or gender. The purpose of this study was to examine the association of strategies used for pain self-management and outcomes with type of pain, acute or chronic, age, or gender in a socioeconomically homogenous population, pharmacists.
Methods
Pharmacists with acute or chronic pain and a valid email completed an on-line questionnaire on demographic characteristics, pain characteristics, pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies for managing pain, and outcomes (e.g. pain intensity). Univariate analysis was conducted by stratifying on type of pain (acute or chronic), then stratifying on gender (men vs. women) and age (younger vs. older). The a priori alpha level was 0.05.
Results
A total of 366 pharmacists completed the questionnaire, 212 with acute pain (average age=44±12.1; 36% men) and 154 with chronic pain (average age=53±14.0; 48% men). The chronic pain group reported substantially higher levels of pain before treatment, level of post-treatment pain, level of pain at which sleep was possible, and goal pain levels (effect sizes [ES’s]=0.37–0.61). The chronic pain group were substantially more likely to use prescription non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDS), opioids, and non-prescription pain relievers (ES’s=0.29–0.80), and non-medical strategies (ES’s=0.56–0.77). Participants with chronic pain also were less confident (ES=0.54) and less satisfied (ES=0.52). In contrast, there were no differences within either the acute or chronic pain groups related to gender and outcomes. In the acute pain group, there also were no gender differences related to management strategies. However, younger age in the acute pain group was associated with use of herbal remedies and use of rest. Within the chronic pain group, men were more likely to use NSAIDS and women more likely to use hot/cold packs or massage while older participants were more likely to use massage. Variability in post-treatment level of pain and percent relief was high in all groups (coefficient of variation=25%–100%).
Conclusions
The differences between acute and chronic pain were substantial and included differences in demographic characteristics, pain characteristics, management strategies used, and outcomes. In contrast, few associations between age and gender with either management strategies or outcomes were identified, although the variability was high.
Implications
When managing or researching pain management, acute pain should be differentiated from chronic pain. Because of the substantial variability within the gender and age groups, an individual approach to pain management irrespective of age and gender may be most useful.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Neurology (clinical)
Reference44 articles.
1. IOM (Institute of Medicine). Relieving pain in America: A blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011. 2. Elzahaf RA, Tashani OA, Unsworth BA, Johnson MI. The prevalence of chronic pain with an analysis of countries with a human development index less than 0.9: a systematic review without meta-analysis. Curr Med Res Opin 2012;28:1221–9.10.1185/03007995.2012.70313222697274 3. Verhaak PF, Kerssens JJ, Dekker J, Sorbi MJ, Bensign JM. Prevalence of chronic benign pain disorder among adults: a review of the literature. Pain 1998;77:231–9.10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00117-19808348 4. Greenspan JD, Craft RM, LeResche L, Arendt-Nielsen L, Berkley KJ, Fillingim RB, Gold MS, Holdcroft A, Lautenbacher S, Mayer EA, Mogil JS, Murphy AZ, Traub RJ, the Consensus Working Group of the Sex, Gender, and Pain SIG of the IASP. Studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia: a consensus report. Pain 2007;132:S26–45.10.1016/j.pain.2007.10.01417964077 5. Racine M, Dominque D, Dupuis G, Guerriere DN, Zagorski B, Choiniere M, Canadian STOP-PAIN Research Group. The Canadian STOP-PAIN project: the burden of chronic pain – does sex really matter? Clin J Pain 2014;30:443–52.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|