Examining duration in the imagery dose-response relationship
Author:
Itoh Sho1ORCID, Morris Tony2, Spittle Michael3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. idemic Ltd. , Tokyo , Japan 2. Institute for Health and Sport , Victoria University , Melbourne , Australia 3. College of Sport and Exercise Science , Victoria University , Melbourne , Australia
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Imagery training is an effective technique in sport psychology for skill development and enhancement at various levels of skill performance. Despite its application, there is limited evidence to inform decisions around the appropriate doses of imagery duration for performance enhancement of movement in sport and physical activity. The aim of the present study was to experimentally determine whether different imagery durations (8, 13, and 18 min durations in a session) have differential effects on the performance of free-throw shooting (FTS) in the sport of basketball. We applied a dose-response imagery protocol, in which one imagery variable was varied systematically, while other key dose variables were held constant.
Methods
We recruited 36 male basketball players (M
age=25.17 years SD=4.26) and allocated them to one of three imagery training conditions or a control condition. Participants in the control condition had no imagery training sessions. Imagery repetitions were held constant at 20 repetitions per imagery session with a frequency of 3 imagery sessions per week over four weeks.
Results
The results showed that the 13- and 18-min imagery durations were more effective than the 8-min duration condition for the basketball free-throw shooting. The 13-min condition was significantly higher at post- and retention-test than at pre-test, indicating it was most effective in this study.
Conclusions
The findings of the present study highlight the importance of imagery duration in imagery training design and may inform coaches, sport psychologists, and athletes in designing effective programs for individual athletes.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Applied Psychology,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Reference79 articles.
1. Allami, N., Paulignan, Y., Brovelli, A., & Boussaoud, D. (2008). Visuo-motor learning with combination of different rates of motor imagery and physical practice. Experimental Brain Research, 184(1), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1086-x. 2. Anton, N. E., Howley, L. D., Pimentel, M., Davis, C. K., Brown, C., & Stefanidis, D. (2016). Effectiveness of a mental skills curriculum to reduce novices’ stress. Journal of Surgical Research, 206(1), 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.07.019. 3. Anuar, N., Williams, S. E., & Cumming, J. (2018). Comparing PETTLEP imagery against observation imagery on vividness and ease of movement imagery. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16(2), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2016.1177104. 4. Arnaud, S., Martin, F. L., Francine, M., Carol, L. R., Julien, D., & Philip, L. J. (2013). The comparison between motor imagery and verbal rehearsal on the learning of sequential movements. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 773. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00773. 5. Bond Brill, J., Perry, A. C., Parker, L., Robinson, A., & Burnett, K. (2002). Dose-response effect of walking exercise on weight loss. How much is enough? International Journal of Obesity, 26, 1484–1493. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802133.
|
|