Affiliation:
1. Modern Languages , Southern Arkansas University , 306 Tidwell St , Magnolia , AR , 71753-5000 , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Texts containing information in different modes are growing in number, technological sophistication, and quality presentation. In this changing semiotic landscape, it is timely to examine which mode combination(s) is most comprehensible for English learners. Accordingly, three text conditions – a verbal text, a supplementary text, and a complementary text – were examined for which mode combination(s) produces the best comprehension outcomes for English learners. Participants were intermediate learners (n = 111) and advanced learners (n = 111). Each language group was further divided into three subgroups (n = 37), and each of the subgroups was tasked with reading in one text condition and answering questions about the text. Participants’ comprehension scores were compared across the text conditions and language groups. The results revealed that the complementary text condition significantly impedes learners’ comprehension, and no significant difference was observed between the verbal text and the supplementary text conditions. These results indicate that learners did not engage in multimodal reading by integrating the various modes at interplay in the texts. For a complete literacy competence, these findings raise the need for engaging learners in deciphering texts from a multimodal perspective by establishing connections across the semiotic resources present in a text.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Communication
Reference39 articles.
1. Abraham, P. and Farías, M. (2017). Reading with eyes wide open: reflections on the impact of multimodal texts in second language reading. in Ikala 22: 57–70, https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n01a04.
2. Alderson, J.C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Baharani, B. and Ghafournia, N. (2015). The impact of multimodal texts on reading achievement: a study of Iranian secondary school learners. J. Appl. Ling. Engl. Lit. 4: 161–170.
4. Bateman, J.A. (2008). Multimodality and genre: a foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Bateman, J.A. (2011). The decomposability of semiotic modes. In: O’Halloran, K.L., and Smith, B.A. (Eds.), Multimodal studies: multiple approaches and domains. London: Routledge, pp. 17–38.