Explaining the innovation dichotomy: the contexts, contents, conflicts, and compromises of innovation stories

Author:

Lemmetty Soila1

Affiliation:

1. School of Educational Sciences and Psychology , University of Eastern Finland , Po. Box 111, 80101 , Joensuu , Finland

Abstract

Abstract This study describes the narratives of innovation produced in a knowledge-based company, constructs them into core stories and develops a narrative framework suitable for researching the topic. The research data consisted of thematic interviews with 23 professionals from the Finnish technology company. Innovation stories were convoluted, identifying innovation-framing contexts that were related to ownership, drivers, continuity, decisions and values. Based on these narratives, the study generated the 4Co (context, content, conflict, and compromise) analytical framework suitable for examining narrative data in innovation research. The study also produced an ideal description of innovation as a simultaneously shared and personally meaningful evolutionary learning process that takes place in small steps and requires a balance of necessity and freedom as well as decision-making based on intuition and facts, producing human efficiency as a value for employees and the organisation. Based on the findings, scientific, methodological, and practical discussions are also presented.

Funder

Research Council of Finland

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference62 articles.

1. Abbot, H. Porter. 2008. The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

2. Abernathy, William J. & Kim B. Clark. 1985. Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy 14(1). 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(85)90021-6.

3. Amabile, Teresa M. 1996. Creativity and innovation in organizations. Harvard Business School Background Note.

4. Anderson, Neil, Kristina Potočnik & Jing Zhou. 2014. Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management 40(5). 1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128.

5. Auvinen, Tommi. 2012. The ghost leader: An empirical study on narrative leadership. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies 17(1). 4–15.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3