Genetic analysis, ultrasound phenotype, and pregnancy outcomes of fetuses with Xp22.33 or Yp11.32 microdeletions
Author:
Cai Meiying1, Chen Xuemei1, Li Ying1, Lin Na1, Huang Hailong1, Xu Liangpu1
Affiliation:
1. Medical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect , Fuzhou , P.R. China
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The phenotypes of Xp22.33 or Yp11.32 microdeletions comprising the short-stature homeobox (SHOX) gene have been extensively described in adults and children. Herein, the prenatal ultrasound phenotype and pregnancy outcomes of fetuses with Xp22.33/Yp11.32 microdeletions were analyzed to improve our understanding, diagnosis, and monitoring of this genetic condition in the fetal stage.
Methods
A total of 9,100 pregnant women referred to tertiary units for prenatal diagnosis were evaluated by chromosomal microarray analysis(CMA).
Results
Seven (0.08 %) fetuses had Xp22.33/Yp11.32 microdeletions, ranging from 243 kb to 1.1 Mb, that comprised SHOX. The ultrasonic phenotypes differed among these fetuses, with three fetuses presenting abnormal bone development, one had labial-palatal deformity and strawberry head, two had an abnormal ultrasonic soft marker, and one had no abnormalities. After genetic counseling, only one couple underwent pedigree assessment, which confirmed the paternal origin of the microdeletion. This infant presented delayed speech development, whereas other three infants showed a typical postnatal development. In three cases, the parents chose to terminate the pregnancy.
Conclusions
The ultrasonic phenotype of fetuses with Xp22.33/Yp11.32 microdeletions resulting in SHOX heterozygosity loss is variable. Prenatal CMA can quickly and effectively diagnose Xp22.33/Yp11.32 microdeletions and SHOX loss, which may help prenatal counseling.
Funder
Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference38 articles.
1. American College of O, Gynecologists Committee on G. Committee opinion No. 581: the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:1374–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000438962.16108.d1. 2. Cao, Y, Li, Z, Rosenfeld, JA, Pursley, AN, Patel, A, Huang, J, et al.. Contribution of genomic copy-number variations in prenatal oral clefts: a multicenter cohort study. Genet Med 2016;18:1052–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.216. 3. Xi, Q, Zhu, X, Wang, Y, Ru, T, Dai, C, Hu, Y, et al.. Copy number variations in multicystic dysplastic kidney: update for prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling. Prenat Diagn 2016;36:463–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4807. 4. Rao, E, Weiss, B, Fukami, M, Rump, A, Rappold, GA, Mertz, A, et al.. Pseudoautosomal deletions encompassing a novel homeobox gene cause growth failure in idiopathic short stature and Turner syndrome. Nat Genet 1997;16:54–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0597-54. 5. Jain, A, Cucerzan, S, Azzam, S, Barca-Tierno, V, Hisado-Oliva, A, Belinchon, A, et al.. SHOX interacts with the chondrogenic transcription factors SOX5 and SOX6 to activate the aggrecan enhancer. Hum Mol Genet 2011;20:1547–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddr032.
|
|