Verbraucherschutz aus institutionen- und verhaltensökonomischer Sicht

Author:

Döring Thomas1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Hochschule Darmstadt Fachbereich Gesellschaftswissenschaften Haardtring 100 Darmstadt Deutschland

Abstract

Abstract From an economic point of view, there is a consensus that sufficient consumer protection cannot be achieved solely through effective competition policy aimed at limiting the abuse of market power to the detriment of consumers. However, the economic justification for an explicit policy of consumer protection is far less uniform. In the past, the standard approach to explain consumer behavior and to justify government consumer protection derived from information economics. However, the fact that consumer protection based solely on information economics has been repeatedly criticized in recent years points to the need for a broader theoretical foundation of consumer protection policy. Against this background, the article aims at broadening the perspective of an economically based consumer policy by resorting to institutional economic as well as behavioral economic considerations, which will be contrasted with each other in their respective insights.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Medicine

Reference90 articles.

1. Akerlof, G.A. (1970), The Market of “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism, in: Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84, S. 488–500.

2. Alchian, A.A. und S.L. Woodward (1988), The Firm is Dead, Long Live the Firm, in: Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 26, S. 65–79.

3. Arrow, K.J. (1983), The Organisation of Economic Activity: Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market versus Non-Market Allocation, in: Arrow, K. (Hrsg.) General Equilibrium – Collected Papers, Vol. 2, Cambridge (MA), S. 133–155.

4. Arrow, K.J. (1985), The Economics of Agency, in: Pratt, J.W. und R.J. Zeckhauser (Hrsg.), Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business, Boston, S. 37–51.

5. Beales, H., Craswell, R. und S.C. Salop (1981), The Efficient Regulation of Consumer Information, in: Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 24, S. 491–539.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3