Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after radical pancreatoduodenectomy
Author:
Wang Yanwei12, Cui Chenghao12, Yu Qiang2, Li Mingtai12, Liang Yurong2
Affiliation:
1. Medical School of Chinese PLA , Beijing , China 2. Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Key Laboratory of Digital Hepatobiliary Surgery of PLA , Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA , Beijing , China
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Hypercoagulation and malnutrition are the characteristic pathophysiological changes associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which are intimately related to cancer progression and prognosis. We aimed to integrate related indicators to build a nomogram model to predict the overall survival (OS) of PDAC patients underwent radical pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).
Methods
Clinicopathological and survival data of 138 patients were retrospectively analyzed according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. A nomogram was built based on the multivariate Cox regression analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and calibration curves were performed based on the bootstrap method to evaluate the predictive performance of the nomogram. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to assess the clinical usefulness of the nomogram.
Results
High-grade tumor (Hazard ratio [HR]: 3.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.51–3.82; p<0.001), vessel carcinoma embolus (HR: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.30–5.31, p=0.007), N2 (HR: 2.90; 95% CI: 1.47–7.37; p=0.004), anemia (HR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.01–2.70; p=0.047), PLR>244.8 (HR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.05–3.45; p=0.033), FBG>3.50 g/L (HR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.04–3.09, p=0.008), and DRR>1.1 (HR: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.56–4.27; p<0.001) served as independent risk factors for poor OS of patients with PDAC underwent radical PD and were implemented to construct a nomogram. The area under curve (AUCs) for the first, second, and third years were 0.713, 0.777, and 0.845, respectively. Besides, calibration curves fitted well to the ideal line. DCA shows that the nomogram has greater net benefit than the existing TNM staging system, suggesting that this model is a more practical clinical tool for predicting the prognosis of PDAC patients.
Conclusions
The nomogram we established based on the characteristic pathophysiological alterations of PDAC for predicting OS in patients who underwent radical pancreatoduodenectomy presented considerable predictive power. It may facilitate prognostic risk stratification and optimize therapeutic decision-making.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference47 articles.
1. Bray, F, Ferlay, J, Soerjomataram, I, Siegel, RL, Torre, LA, Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492. 2. Siegel, RL, Miller, KD, Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020;70:7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21590. 3. Gillen, S, Schuster, T, Meyer Zum Büschenfelde, C, Friess, H, Kleeff, J. Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000267. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000267. 4. Grossberg, AJ, Chu, LC, Deig, CR, Fishman, EK, Hwang, WL, Maitra, A, et al.. Multidisciplinary standards of care and recent progress in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 2020;70:375–403. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21626. 5. Zambirinis, CP, Miller, G. Cancer manipulation of host physiology: lessons from pancreatic cancer. Trends Mol Med 2017;23:465–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2017.03.003.
|
|