Knowledge of osteopathic manipulative medicine and osteopathic physicians in a New York South Asian community

Author:

Lee Jasmine1,Maung Chun1,Espares Jenzel1,Chen Justin1,Yip Frenda1,Lin Willis1,Zhao Lauren1,Li To Shan2

Affiliation:

1. New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine , Old Westbury , NY , USA

2. Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine , New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine , Old Westbury , NY , USA

Abstract

Abstract Context Research regarding patient awareness of osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) can help identify barriers and factors limiting patient knowledge. Levels of knowledge about OMM and osteopathic physicians have been studied in New York’s Chinese and Korean populations, but have not previously been investigated in the South Asian population. Objectives To assess the knowledge of OMM and osteopathic physicians within a South Asian community of New York. Methods A cross-sectional study was designed in which a culturally appropriate survey, provided in both English and Hindi, was administered to study participants in order to measure knowledge of osteopathic medicine. The study utilized convenience sampling and distributed surveys to individuals who identified themselves of South Asian descent at high traffic sites in Hicksville, New York. The survey contained 10 questions, assessing the individual’s knowledge of osteopathic medicine. The Kruskal–Wallis and Chi-Square tests were employed to determine statistical significance of the data obtained from the surveys. Results The survey was conducted on 100 participants in Hicksville, New York. The respondent demographics included 53 males and 47 females with an average age of 41.2 ± 16.3 years old. There were 34 (34%) participants who had heard of osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) and 26 (26%) participants who had knowledge of doctor of osteopathic medicine (DO) physicians. Respondents were found more likely to have knowledge of DOs if they were born in the United States (US) vs. other countries (US, 8 of 14 [57.1%] vs. others, 18 of 86 [20.9%]; p=0.006) or lived longer in the US (11 of 26 [42.3%], p=0.039). Participants who spoke a non-English primary language were also found less likely to have knowledge of DOs as they made up 46 of the 58 respondents who indicated no knowledge (79.3%, p=0.042). Conclusions A general lack of knowledge of DOs and OMM exists within the South Asian community of Hicksville, New York and lower levels of awareness were found among participants who were male, born outside the US, had a language other than English as their primary language, and had spent less time in the US. Additional educational resources may be implemented to increase awareness of DOs and OMM among this and similar communities.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Complementary and alternative medicine,Complementary and Manual Therapy

Reference25 articles.

1. Aacom.org. 2021. History of osteopathic medicine-its origins and approach to healthcare. Available from: https://www.aacom.org/become-a-doctor/about-osteopathic-medicine/history-of-osteopathic-medicine [Accessed 14 June 2021].

2. What is osteopathic medicine? American Osteopathic Association. Available from: https://osteopathic.org/what-is-osteopathic-medicine/ [Accessed 25 Apr 2021].

3. Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine (OMM) Explained. Bethesda: American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine. Available from: https://www.aacom.org/docs/default-source/become-a-do/aacom-omm-one-pager_v7-(1).pdf?fbclid=IwAR1P9CN48WmfhNyl3wFABqGKAW-WfyyPm2XsG1Ofne3KJ3DMvHwxjXdBfOo [Accessed 19 Mar 2021].

4. The difference between U.S.-trained osteopathic physicians and osteopaths trained abroad. How are U.S. Osteopathic doctors different than those trained abroad. Available from: https://www.aacom.org/become-a-doctor/about-om/US-vs-abroad [Accessed 31 Jan 2021].

5. Gougian, RL, Berkowitz, MR. Gray zone: why a delayed acceptance of osteopathic medicine persists in the international community. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2014;114:754–60. https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2014.145.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3