When (Not) to Trade with Autocrats: Complicity, Exploitation, and Human Rights

Author:

Ip Kevin K. W.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Government and International Studies, Hong Kong Baptist University , 15 Baptist University Road , Kowloon Tong , Hong Kong

Abstract

Abstract Transnational trade is at the heart of the global economy. Trade relations often transcend both ideological divides and regime type. Trading with autocratic regimes, however, raises significant moral issues. In their recent book, On Trade Justice, Mathias Risse and Gabriel Wollner argue that trade with autocratic regimes is morally permissible only under a very limited set of circumstances. This article discusses the morally permissible trade policies that liberal democracies ought to adopt toward autocratic regimes. Liberal democracies trading with autocratic regimes have a special obligation to improve the human rights conditions in these regimes. This duty is partly based on their complicity in human rights violations and on the fact that the democracies benefit from these violations in their trading relationships. Their responsibility goes beyond the improvement of labor conditions and requires various strategies such as imposing trade sanctions and export controls, and making trade conditional on human rights performance.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy

Reference39 articles.

1. Al-Marhubi, F. 2005. “Openness and Governance: Evidence across Countries.” Oxford Development Studies 33 (3–4): 453–71, https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810500199269.

2. Amnesty International. 2020. Ending the Torture Trade: The Path to Global Controls on the “Tools of Torture”. https://www.amnesty.be/IMG/pdf/20201211_rapport_torturetrade.pdf (accessed December 11, 2020).

3. Armstrong, C. 2020. “Dealing with Dictators.” Journal of Political Philosophy 28 (3): 307–31, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12206.

4. Baccini, L., and W. M. Chow. 2018. “The Politics of Preferential Trade Liberalization in Authoritarian Countries.” International Interactions 44 (2): 198–216, https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2017.1373352.

5. Barry, C., and S. Reddy. 2008. International Trade and Labor Standards: A Proposal for Linkage. New York: Columbia University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3