New Diseases and Sectarian Debate in Hellenistic and Roman Medicine

Author:

Harris Arthur1

Affiliation:

1. Department of History and Philosophy of Science , University of Cambridge , Cambridge , UK

Abstract

Abstract Ancient medical practitioners discussed and debated whether previously unknown kinds of disease had been discovered and whether new diseases could come into existence. The debate over new diseases was of fundamental importance in defining the medical sects (haireseis) which came to dominate elite medicine from the Hellenistic period. This paper offers an overview of the most significant Greek and Roman sources for the debate over new diseases and an account of the origins and significance of this debate.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy

Reference58 articles.

1. Acerbi, F. 2003. “On the Shoulders of Hipparchus: A Reappraisal of Ancient Greek Combinatorics.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 57: 465–502, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-003-0067-0.

2. Bobzien, S. 2011. “The Combinatorics of Stoic Conjunction.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 40: 157–88.

3. Debru, A., and G. Sabbah, eds. 1998. Nommer la maladie. Recherches sur le lexique gréco-latin de la pathologie. St-Étienne: Université de St-Étienne.

4. Deichgräber, K. 1965. Die Griechische Empirikerschule. Berlin: Weidmann.

5. Delatte, A., ed. 1939. Anecdota Atheniensia et alia, Vol. 2. Paris: Droz.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3