Bad things can happen: are medical students aware of patient centered care and safety?
Author:
Gillissen Adrian1, Kochanek Tonja1, Zupanic Michaela2, Ehlers Jan1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health , Institute for Didactics and Educational Research in Health Care, Witten/Herdecke University , Witten , Germany 2. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Interprofessional and Collaborative Didactics in Medicine-and Health Professions , Witten/Herdecke University , Witten , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Quality and safety in healthcare are of the utmost importance, but little is known about whether undergraduate students are aware of patient safety concepts. The objectives of our study were to assess the perception of medical students of challenges in patient safety, and collect their perceptions of error management and prevention.
Methods
This study used an exploratory mixed method strategy. The first study phase collected data from semi-structured interviews of 28 students. Based on this, an online survey was constructed and sent to about 80,000 medical students in Germany. 1053 replies were received and analyzed for responses based on gender, curriculum type (problem based [PBC] vs. science based curriculum [SBC]) and years of training.
Results
Most students understand the importance of patient safety, error avoidance, and the challenges of patient safety interventions. Four themes were identified: (a) the culture of patient safety (what is a good doctor? Doctors’ responsibility), (b) the working environment (the inevitability of mistakes, high work load, hierarchy, competition, teamwork), (c) the challenges of risk reduction (error avoidance, management, skills), and (d) materialistic issue (income vs. humanistic values). Female students were more risk aware than male students. Sixteen percent of students expect negative effects (e.g. punishment) when medical errors were disclosed in a team. Regardless, >70% regard teamwork as an effective error avoidance measure. Error disclosure willingness was high (89.7%).
Conclusions
Although not formally part of the curriculum, students had a positive perspective concerning patient safety. The opportunities and challenges for incorporating patient safety content into the training curriculum were identified and presented.
Funder
Kreiskliniken Reutlingen GmbH
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference59 articles.
1. World Health Organization. WHO patient safety curriculum guide for medical schools. Geneva/Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2009. 2. de Vries, EN, Ramrattan, MA, Smorenburg, SM, Gouma, DJ, Boermeester, MA. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:216–23. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2007.023622. 3. Batchelder, AJ, Anderson, L. Defining patient safety: a student perspective. Med Sci Educ 2019;29:399–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-018-00690-1. 4. Nie, Y, Li, L, Duan, Y, Chen, P, Barraclough, BH, Zhang, M, et al.. Patient safety education for undergraduate medical students: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ 2011;11:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-33. 5. Opitz, E, Bösner, S, Heinis, S, Stibane, EC, Jerrentrup, A. Patientensicherheit schon im Studium vermitteln. Internist 2020;61:444–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-020-00772-6.
|
|