Affiliation:
1. KIMEP University , Almaty , Kazakhstan
Abstract
Abstract
By focusing predominantly on discourse production and language management, language policy research de-emphasizes the material sources of inequality. The paper argues that language management, often restricted by ritualistic and symbolic gestures, cannot rectify historically formed relations of power and calls for critical examination of both sociolinguistic and socio-economic consequences of language reforms.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference11 articles.
1. Ahn, Elise & Juldyz Smagulova. 2019. Examining education change in urban Kazakhstan. A short spatial story. In Iveta Silova & Sarfaroz Niyazov (eds.), Globalization on the margins: Education and post-socialist transformations in Central Asia, 2nd ed., 273–291. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
2. Block, David. 2018. Inequality and class in language policy and planning. In Tollefson James & Miguel Perez-Milans (eds.), The Oxford handbook of language policy and planning, 568–588. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Codó, Eva. 2018. Language policy and planning, institutions, and neoliberalization. In Tollefson James & Miguel Perez-Milans (eds.), The Oxford handbook of language policy and planning, 467–484. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Duchêne, Alexandre. 2020. Multilingualism: An insufficient answer to sociolinguistic inequalities. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2020(263). 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-2087.
5. Fleming, Kara & Umberto Ansaldo. 2020. Revivals, nationalism, and linguistic discrimination: Threatening languages. New York: Routledge.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献