Affiliation:
1. School of Entrepreneurship and Management, ShanghaiTech University, Room 436, 393 Middle Huaxia Road, Shanghai, China
Abstract
AbstractThis paper analyzes the effects of direct interconnection agreements in the Internet backbone on content quality investment for content providers (CPs). The model assumes that when the Internet service provider (ISP) has a vertical affiliation with one CP, the ISP directly interconnects the affiliated CP’s traffic to its network for free while collecting a direct interconnection fee from the unaffiliated CP. If the unaffiliated CP’s traffic is indirectly interconnected to the ISP’s network via a third party transit provider, its network quality is lower than that via a direct interconnection. For the CPs’ content quality investments, I find that the affiliated CP invests more in content when the rival indirectly interconnects, leading to a higher total level of content investment. Accordingly, there is a condition under which the ISP does not want to offer direct interconnection to the unaffiliated CP. However, consumers are not always worse off from this interconnection foreclosure. Thus, the regulation of a paid direct interconnection does not necessarily enhance welfare in terms of consumer surplus.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference98 articles.
1. Legal Unbundling can be a Golden Mean between Vertical Integration and Ownership Separation;International Journal of Industrial Organization,2011
2. On the Economics of Internet Peering;Netnomics,1999
3. Net Neutrality and CDN Intermediation;Information Economics and Policy,2019
4. Net Neutrality and Internet Fragmentation: The Role of Online Advertising;International Journal of Industrial Organization,2015
5. Network Neutrality and Congestion Sensitive Content Providers: Implications for Content Variety, Broadband Investment, and Regulation;Information Systems Research,2012
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献