Affiliation:
1. Department of Macroeconomics and International Trade Theory, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw
2. European University Institute of Florence
Abstract
Abstract
In this paper we study Zipf’s law, which postulates that the product of a city’s population and its rank (the number of cities with a larger or equal population) is constant for every city in a given region. We show that the empirical literature indicates that the law may not always hold, although its general form, the rank-size rule, could be a good first approximation of city size distribution. We perform our own empirical analysis of the distribution of the population of Polish cities on the largest possible sample to find that Zipf’s law is rejected for Poland as the city sizes are less evenly distributed than it predicts.
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference28 articles.
1. Alperovich, G & Deutsch, J 1995, ‘The size distribution of urban areas: Testing for the appropriateness of the Pareto distribution using a generalized Box-Cox transformation function’, Journal of Regional Science, vol. 35, pp. 267–276.
2. Auerbach, F 1913, ‘Das Gesetz der Bevölkerungskonzentration’, Petermann’s Geographische Mitteilungen, vol. 59, pp. 74–76.
3. Bee, M, Riccaboni, M & Schiavo, S 2013, ‘The size distribution of US cities: Not Pareto, even in the tail’, Economics Letters, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 232–237.
4. Berry, BJL & Okulicz-Kozaryn, A 2011, ‘The city size distribution debate: Resolution for US urban regions and megalopolitan areas’, Cities, vol. 29, Supplement 1, pp. 17–23.
5. Black, D & Henderson, V 2003, ‘Urban evolution in the USA’, Journal of Economic Geography, vol. 3, pp. 343–372.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献