Attitudes to professional boundaries among therapists with and without substance abuse history

Author:

Pietkiewicz Igor,Skowrońska-Włoch Karolina

Abstract

Abstract There is no empirical research exploring how substance abuse therapists perceive and manage their professional role or privacy boundaries. This study explores their attitudes associated with self-disclosure and dual relationships. Ten therapists, five who had recovered (neophytes) and five who had never been substance dependent, shared their work experiences during semi-structured, in-depth interviews, which have been subjected to interpretative phenomenological analysis. While nonneophytes were generally reluctant to share personal information or establish alternative forms of relationship with current or former clients, neophytes were more open to using self-disclosure and admitted changing professional relationships into friendships. These findings are discussed in relation to ethical codes, training and supervision in substance abuse treatment.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Psychology

Reference64 articles.

1. Psychodynamic psychotherapies and the treatment of co - occurring psychological trauma and addiction In Psychological trauma and addiction treatment New York;Davis,2011

2. Therapist self disclosure Research based suggestions for practitioners In;Knox,2003

3. Boundaries of privacy Dialectics of disclosure State University of New York;Petronio,2002

4. Zur Dual relationships New York Publishing Company;Lazarus;psychotherapy,2002

5. The therapeutic community Theory model method New York Publishing Company;De Leon,2000

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. People in Recovery from Substance Use Disorders: What Motivates Them to Enter Addiction Treatment Agencies as Counselors?;Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities;2021-12-03

2. Mapping qualitative research in psychology across five Central-Eastern European countries: Contemporary trends: A paradigm analysis;Qualitative Research in Psychology;2019-05-22

3. Woundedness and Boundaries;Reflective Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy in a Diverse Society;2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3