Affiliation:
1. Homeland Security Operations and Analysis Center , RAND Corporation , 1776 Main Street , 90401 Santa Monica , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Communities have a vital role to play in managing the risks associated with natural disasters. As such, their strengths, weaknesses, and priority concerns must be factored into policy decisions to ensure local recovery efforts reflect community needs. Regular engagement with community members provides opportunities for emergency managers and first responders to tap into a reservoir of local knowledge to build a shared understanding of how to foster local preparedness and help communities reduce the impact of a disaster. Not all communities are alike; needs can differ for a variety of reasons and can help determine the best ways to galvanize an appropriate response. The methods of engagement should also be tailored to ensure communities are willing and able to participate in the types of interactions emergency managers wish to initiate. In this paper, we used a mixed method approach to examine several different community engagement and data collection strategies conducted, observed or examined by our research team during six months of post-Hurricane Maria recovery efforts in Puerto Rico from February to July 2018. The aim of this study is to assess whether different outreach approaches used illuminated different perceptions about disaster preparedness and recovery and to identify what works and what does not work when engaging communities in emergency preparedness and recovery activities.
Subject
Safety Research,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference35 articles.
1. Abraham, M., A. Eckert, J. Isaac, J. Logan, L. Amy, E. Marr, M. I. Shannon, J. Medeiros, K. Procter, R. Sissons, and W. Adam. 2007. Guidelines for Engaging the Public Post-disaster. School of Environmental Design and Rural Development Program University of Guelph. Also available at http://www.waynecaldwell.ca/Students/Projects/PublicEngagement_FINAL1.pdf.
2. Agar, M., and J. MacDonald. 1995. “Focus Groups and Ethnography.” Human Organization 54: 78–86. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.54.1.x102372362631282.
3. Albrecht, T., G. Johnson, and J. Walther. 1993. “Understanding Communications Processes in Focus Groups.” In Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art, edited by D. Morgan, 51–64. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Aldag, L., and A. Tinsley. 1994. “A Comparison of Focus Group Interviews to In-Depth Interviews in Determining Food Choice Influences.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Information 2: 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1300/J108v02n03_11.
5. Barton, M. A. 2018. FEMA Hopes to Embed Staff in Local Communities. NACO.org. Also available at https://www.naco.org/articles/fema-hopes-embed-staff-local-communities.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献