Best Practices and Lessons Learned from Community Engagement and Data Collection Strategies in Post-Hurricane Maria Puerto Rico

Author:

Saum-Manning Lisa1

Affiliation:

1. Homeland Security Operations and Analysis Center , RAND Corporation , 1776 Main Street , 90401 Santa Monica , USA

Abstract

Abstract Communities have a vital role to play in managing the risks associated with natural disasters. As such, their strengths, weaknesses, and priority concerns must be factored into policy decisions to ensure local recovery efforts reflect community needs. Regular engagement with community members provides opportunities for emergency managers and first responders to tap into a reservoir of local knowledge to build a shared understanding of how to foster local preparedness and help communities reduce the impact of a disaster. Not all communities are alike; needs can differ for a variety of reasons and can help determine the best ways to galvanize an appropriate response. The methods of engagement should also be tailored to ensure communities are willing and able to participate in the types of interactions emergency managers wish to initiate. In this paper, we used a mixed method approach to examine several different community engagement and data collection strategies conducted, observed or examined by our research team during six months of post-Hurricane Maria recovery efforts in Puerto Rico from February to July 2018. The aim of this study is to assess whether different outreach approaches used illuminated different perceptions about disaster preparedness and recovery and to identify what works and what does not work when engaging communities in emergency preparedness and recovery activities.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Safety Research,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference35 articles.

1. Abraham, M., A. Eckert, J. Isaac, J. Logan, L. Amy, E. Marr, M. I. Shannon, J. Medeiros, K. Procter, R. Sissons, and W. Adam. 2007. Guidelines for Engaging the Public Post-disaster. School of Environmental Design and Rural Development Program University of Guelph. Also available at http://www.waynecaldwell.ca/Students/Projects/PublicEngagement_FINAL1.pdf.

2. Agar, M., and J. MacDonald. 1995. “Focus Groups and Ethnography.” Human Organization 54: 78–86. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.54.1.x102372362631282.

3. Albrecht, T., G. Johnson, and J. Walther. 1993. “Understanding Communications Processes in Focus Groups.” In Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art, edited by D. Morgan, 51–64. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

4. Aldag, L., and A. Tinsley. 1994. “A Comparison of Focus Group Interviews to In-Depth Interviews in Determining Food Choice Influences.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Information 2: 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1300/J108v02n03_11.

5. Barton, M. A. 2018. FEMA Hopes to Embed Staff in Local Communities. NACO.org. Also available at https://www.naco.org/articles/fema-hopes-embed-staff-local-communities.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3