National parliaments fighting back? Institutional engineering as a successful means to become active actors in EU affairs

Author:

Fromage Diane

Abstract

Abstract The European integration process has long been characterised by the predominance of national executive powers. National parliaments were recognised as European actors after several decades only, in the Maastricht Treaty first and to an even larger extent in the Lisbon Treaty. Parliaments were hence long dependent on national constitutional, legal and administrative arrangements to be able to participate in EU affairs. This paper analyses how national parliaments (and their members) have reacted to the challenge the European integration process has represented for them while it also takes due account of the role other institutions, such as constitutional courts, have played in this field. It is argued that while these arrangements may have been successful in allowing national parliaments to play a greater role in this field, they should remain temporary for they are characterised by uncertainty and instability and make it generally difficult for citizens to follow up on national parliaments’ actions and to be fully informed.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Reference66 articles.

1. Goldoni The Early Warning System and the Monti II Regulation : the Case for a Political Interpretation;Marco;European Constitutional Law Review,2014

2. In the Name of Sovereign Statehood Critical Introduction to the Lisbon Judgement of the German Constitutional Court Common Market XLVI;Thym Daniel;Law Review,2009

3. Giuseppe Dating Cinderella : On Subsidiarity as a Political Safeguard of Federalism in the European Union European Public Law XVII;Martinico,2011

4. In the Name of Sovereign Statehood Critical Introduction to the Lisbon Judgement of the German Constitutional Court Common Market XLVI;Thym Daniel;Law Review,2009

5. Die Europäische Union unter Aufsicht des Bundesverfassungsgerichts Europäische Grundrechte Zeitschrift;Tomuschat Christian,1993

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3