Dependency profiles in the large-scale analysis of discourse connectives

Author:

Laippala Veronika1,Kyröläinen Aki-Juhani23,Kanerva Jenna4,Ginter Filip4

Affiliation:

1. School of Languages and Translation Studies , University of Turku , Turku , Finland

2. Department of linguistics and languages , McMaster University , Hamilton, ON , Canada

3. Applied Linguistics, Brock University , St. Catharines, ON , Canada

4. Turku NLP Group , University of Turku , Turku , Finland

Abstract

Abstract This article presents dependency profiles (DPs) as an empirical method to investigate linguistic elements and their application to the study of 24 discourse connectives in the 3.7-billion token Finnish Internet Parsebank (http://bionlp-www.utu.fi/dep_search/). DPs are based on co-occurrence patterns of the discourse connectives with dependency syntax relations. They follow the assumption of usage-based models, according to which the semantic and functional properties of linguistic expressions arise based on their distributional characteristics. We focus on the typical usage patterns reflected by the DPs and the (dis)similarities among discourse connectives that these patterns reveal. We demonstrate that 1) DPs can be analyzed with clustering to obtain linguistically meaningful groupings among the connectives and that 2) the clustering can be combined with support vector machines to obtain generic and stable linguistic characteristics of the discourse connectives. We show that this data-driven method offers support for previous results and reveals novel tendencies outside the scope of studies on smaller corpora. As the method is based on automatic syntactic analysis following the cross-linguistic universal dependencies, it does not require manual annotation and can be applied to a number of languages and in contrastive studies.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference71 articles.

1. Arppe, Antti. 2008. Univariate, bivariate and multivariate methods in corpus-based lexicography - a study of synonymy. Helsinki: University of Helsinki dissertation.

2. Berez, Andrea L. & Stefan Th. Gries. 2009. In defense of corpus-based methods: A behavioral profile analysis of polysemous get in English. In Steven Moran, Darren S. Tanner & Michael Scanlon (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th northwest linguistics conference (University of Washington Working Papers in Linguistics 27), 157–166. Seattle, WA: Department of Linguistics.

3. Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

4. Biber, Douglas. 1995. Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

5. Bolinger, Dwight. 1968. Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa 2. 119–127.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3