Competencies for improving diagnosis: an interprofessional framework for education and training in health care

Author:

Olson Andrew1,Rencic Joseph2,Cosby Karen3,Rusz Diana4,Papa Frank5,Croskerry Pat6,Zierler Brenda7,Harkless Gene8,Giuliano Michael A.9,Schoenbaum Stephen10,Colford Cristin11,Cahill Maureen12,Gerstner Laura13,Grice Gloria R.14,Graber Mark L.15

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics , University of Minnesota Medical School , Minneapolis, MN , USA

2. Internal Medicine Residency Program , Tufts University School of Medicine , Boston, MA , USA

3. Rush Medical College , Chicago, IL , USA

4. Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine , Chicago, IL , USA

5. University of North Texas Health Science Center , Fort Worth, TX , USA

6. Department of Emergency Medicine , Dalhousie University Medical School , Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada

7. University of Washington School of Nursing , Seattle, WA , USA

8. University of New Hampshire , Durham, NH , USA

9. Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall , South Orange, NJ , USA

10. Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation , New York, NY , USA

11. University of North Carolina School of Medicine , Chapel Hill, NC , USA

12. National Council State Boards of Nursing , Chicago, IL , USA

13. Campbell University Physician Assistant Program , Buies Creek, NC , USA

14. St Louis College of Pharmacy , St. Louis, MO , USA

15. Chief Medical Officer, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine , New York, NY , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Given an unacceptably high incidence of diagnostic errors, we sought to identify the key competencies that should be considered for inclusion in health professions education programs to improve the quality and safety of diagnosis in clinical practice. Methods An interprofessional group reviewed existing competency expectations for multiple health professions, and conducted a search that explored quality, safety, and competency in diagnosis. An iterative series of group discussions and concept prioritization was used to derive a final set of competencies. Results Twelve competencies were identified: Six of these are individual competencies: The first four (#1–#4) focus on acquiring the key information needed for diagnosis and formulating an appropriate, prioritized differential diagnosis; individual competency #5 is taking advantage of second opinions, decision support, and checklists; and #6 is using reflection and critical thinking to improve diagnostic performance. Three competencies focus on teamwork: Involving the patient and family (#1) and all relevant health professionals (#2) in the diagnostic process; and (#3) ensuring safe transitions of care and handoffs, and “closing the loop” on test result communication. The final three competencies emphasize system-related aspects of care: (#1) Understanding how human-factor elements influence the diagnostic process; (#2) developing a supportive culture; and (#3) reporting and disclosing diagnostic errors that are recognized, and learning from both successful diagnosis and from diagnostic errors. Conclusions These newly defined competencies are relevant to all health professions education programs and should be incorporated into educational programs.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference20 articles.

1. Institute of Medicine. Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2015.

2. Lucian Leape Institute. Unmet needs – teaching physicians to provide safe patient care, 2010. Available at: www.ihi.org.

3. Huang G, Newman L, Schwartzstein R. Critrical thinking in health professions education: Summary and consensus statements of the Millenium Conference 2011. Teach Learn Med Int J 2014;26:95–102.

4. Macy Foundation. Team-based competencies. building a shared foundation for education and clinical practice, 2014. https://macyfoundation.org/news-and-commentary/ipec-reports.

5. Stark M, Fins J. The ethical imperative to think about thinking. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2014;23:386–96.

Cited by 64 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3