Identity Politics in Managing the System Risks of Nation-Building: On the Example of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Author:

Dunaev Vladimir1,Kurganskaya Valentina1,Shaikemelev Mukhtarbek1

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Philosophy, Political Sciences and Religion Studies , Kurmangazy str. 29, Almaty 050010 , The Republic of Kazakhstan , E-mail: iph@iph.kz

Abstract

Abstract In previous years, the evolution of nation-building politics in the Republic of Kazakhstan was characterized by an alternation of tactical schemes that actualized either the ethnocultural or civil-political foundations of statehood. At present, the emerging common Kazakhstani culture is becoming the basis for mutually agreed development of ethnocultural and civic identity as its own elements. In the system of common Kazakhstani culture, the civil and ethnocultural models of the nation are the poles or attractors of the process of self-organization of a single nationwide Kazakhstan identity. The optimal identity politics in the nation-building risk management in the conditions of modern Kazakhstan is to adopt the point of view of the whole set of identification models and to maintain the dynamic balance of conflicting identities through the mechanism of mutual checks and balances.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,History

Reference32 articles.

1. Aitaly, A. (2010), ‘We are strong in unity,’ Aktiubinskii Vestnik, 29 April. Retrieved from http://avestnik.kz/amangeldy-ajtaly-my-silny-edinstvom-2 [accessed 8 Feb 2019]

2. Altermatt, U. (2000), Etnonatsionalizm v Evrope [Ethnonationalism in Europe], Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities.

3. Bauman, Z. (2001), The Individualized Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.

4. Beck, U. & Levy, D. (2013), ‘Cosmopolitanized nations: re-imagining collectivity in world risk society,’ Theory, Culture and Society, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327641245722310.1177/0263276412457223

5. Brubaker, R. (2004), Ethnicity without Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3