The colexification of vision and cognition in Mandarin: controlled activity surpasses uncontrolled experience

Author:

Dai Ying1ORCID,Wu Yicheng2

Affiliation:

1. School of Foreign Languages , Fuzhou University , Fuzhou , China

2. Department of Linguistics , 12377 Zhejiang University , Hangzhou , China

Abstract

Abstract Given the colexification of perception and cognition, Georgakopoulos et al. (2022. Universal and macro-areal patterns in the lexicon: A case-study in the perception-cognition domain. Linguistic Typology 26(2). 439–487) claim that uncontrolled experience rather than controlled activity has a direct linkage to cognition. To test whether this is a universal tendency, this study conducts a contrastive behavioral profile analysis of two basic vision verbs in Mandarin: kàn, a controlled activity verb, and jiàn, an uncontrolled experience verb. The results show that (i) both kàn and jiàn colexify visual activity and cognitive senses; (ii) kàn is able to express a wider range of cognitive meanings, i.e., know, understand, and think, whereas jiàn only extends into know; and (iii) visual and cognitive meanings have more proximal relationships in the colexification pattern of kàn than that of jiàn. The study confirms the universality of the colexification between vision and cognition while providing counterexamples to the above-mentioned large data-based findings. Accordingly, a dichotomy of controlled activity versus uncontrolled experience is proposed for the colexification of vision and cognition in cognitive typology.

Funder

the Major Project of the National Social Science Fund of P.R. China

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference88 articles.

1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Anne Storch (eds.). 2013. Perception and cognition in language and culture (Brill’s Studies in Language, Cognition and Culture 3). Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV.

2. Atkins, Beryl T. Sue. 1987. Semantic ID tags: Corpus evidence for dictionary senses. Paper presented at the Third Annual Conference of the UW Centre for the New Oxford English Dictionary, University of Waterloo, 9–10 November.

3. Berez, Andrea L. & Stefan Th. Gries. 2008. In defense of corpus-based methods: A behavioral profile analysis of polysemous get in English. Paper presented at the 24th Northwest Linguistics Conference (NWLC), University of Washington, 3–4 May.

4. Bolinger, Dwight. 1968. Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2(2). 119–127.

5. Bond, Francis & Kyonghee Paik. 2012. A survey of wordnets and their licenses. Paper presented at the 6th International Global Wordnet Conference (GWC 2012), 9–13 January.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3