When is ostensive communication used for joint action?

Author:

Vesper Cordula12ORCID,Morisseau Tiffany34,Knoblich Günther5,Sperber Dan5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Linguistics , Cognitive Science, and Semiotics, Aarhus University , Aarhus , Denmark

2. Interacting Minds Center , Aarhus University , Aarhus , Denmark

3. LaPEA, Université de Paris, Boulogne-Billancourt, France, IFSTTAR, Université Gustave Eiffel Boulogne-Billancourt , France

4. IFSTTAR , Université Gustave Eiffel , Versailles , France

5. Department of Cognitive Science , Central European University , Vienna , Austria

Abstract

Abstract Joint actions typically require that information relevant for performing a task together is available to the interaction partners. In some situations, such information is perceptually retrievable and salient enough for co-actors to simply use it. In other situations, the relevant information needs to be actively shared among co-actors, e.g., by making it more perceptually salient or indicating it by means of a conventional signal. Here we consider a third case, where the information is not perceptually available and cannot be communicated by conventional means. How do joint action partners coordinate in such situations? We propose that co-actors resort to ostensive communication, that is, they draw attention to the fact that they intend to communicate some specific information. Two experiments tested the proposed role of ostensive communication for joint action. In a non-verbal joint building task, the category membership of different objects was known to only one person in a dyad, who needed to inform the partner which object type to use. In line with our hypothesis, most participants highlighted a particular object category with an ostensive gesture (characterized by containing more submovements than a natural placing movement) to resolve perceptual ambiguity. We conclude that ostensive communication is especially useful for joint action in situations where task-relevant information is not available to all co-actors and where it cannot be perceptually highlighted or conventionally communicated.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Communication,Language and Linguistics

Reference32 articles.

1. Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using Lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.

2. Battistella, Edwin L. 1990. Markedness: The evaluative superstructure of language. Albany: SUNY Press.

3. Brand, Rebecca J., Dare A. Baldwin, & Leslie A. Ashburn. 2002. Evidence for “motionese:” Modifications in mothers’ infant-directed action. Developmental Science 5(1). 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00211.

4. Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

5. Clark, Herbert H. 2003. Pointing and placing. In Sotaro Kita (ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet, 243–268. London: Psychology Press.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3