Affiliation:
1. Department of Radiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, HangzhouChina
2. Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, HangzhouChina
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance image (MRI) and bone scintigraphy (BS) in the diagnosis of breast cancer bone metastases.MethodsSearching in the databases including PubMed, Embase about the comparative study of MRI and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of breast cancer bone metastases during 2000~2018. After we screened further, the extracted effective data were calculated by Meta-Disc 1.4 software.ResultsWe obtained 4 articles. The pooled estimates for sensitivity of MRI, BS were 0.99 (95% CI, [0.95, 1.00]) and 0.93 (95% CI, [0.88, 0.97]) respectively; For specificity were 0.99 (95% CI, [0.95, 1.00]) and 0.86 (95% CI, [0.79, 0.92]) respectively. The AUC of SROC curve for MRI and BS were 0.9948 and 0.9675 respectively.ConclusionMRI remains to be a satisfactory method for the diagnosis of breast cancer bone metastases and should first be considered for patients.
Reference32 articles.
1. Diagnostic role of (18) F-FECH-PET/CT compared with bone scan in evaluating the prostate cancer patients referring with biochemical recurrence;ISRN Oncol,2012
2. Questions and answers on prostate multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging: Everything a urologist should know;Actas Urol Esp,2016
3. MRI investigations in patients with problems due to metal-on-metal implants;Orthopde,2013
4. Comparison of whole-body MRI with automatic moving table technique and bone scintigraphy for screening for bone metastases in patients with breast cancer;Eur Radiol,2004
5. Cancer statistics, 2018;Ca A Cancer J Clin,2018
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献