Corporate entrepreneurship programmes as mechanisms to accelerate product innovations

Author:

Ghura Amarpreet Singh1ORCID,Erkut Burak2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Assistant Professor , FLAME University , Pune , India

2. Faculty of Economics , Administrative and Social Sciences , Bahçeşehir Cyprus University , Nicosia , Turkey

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores how firms engage in corporate entrepreneurship through programmes, and what kind of outcomes they achieve in terms of innovations. Insights are drawn from four cases of organisations that engaged in corporate entrepreneurial activities. The paper identifies two dimensions of corporate entrepreneurship programmes as idea themes, indicating whether programmes are designed with specific themes in mind, and idea ownership, indicating whether there is a dedicated team to focus on new ideas, or not. These dimensions are under the direct control of management. Based on these two dimensions, four models of corporate entrepreneurial activities are presented linking each of these models to one of the four cases of product innovations (product line extensions, product improvements, new products, start-up businesses). By drawing on the insights of the effectuation and causation logics, the paper provides a fresh perspective of corporate entrepreneurship programmes in an emerging, non-Western cultural setup and the product innovation context. This is primarily done by introducing a 2 × 2 matrix regarding corporate entrepreneurship idea themes and idea ownership in an emerging context.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,Business and International Management

Reference73 articles.

1. Aktan, B., and C. Bulut. 2008. “Financial Performance Impacts of Corporate Entrepreneurship in Emerging Markets: A Case of Turkey.” European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences 12: 69–79.

2. Altringer, B. 2013. “A New Model for Innovation in Big Companies.” Harvard Business Review November 1.

3. Arvidsson, H. G. S., and D. N. Coudounaris. 2020. “Effectuation versus Causation: A Case Study of an IT Recruitment Firm.” International Journal of Entrepreneurship 24 (4): 1–13.

4. Baum, J. R., E. A. Locke, and K. G. Smith. 2001. “A Multidimensional Model of Venture Growth.” Academy of Management Journal 44 (2): 292–303.

5. Boyatzis, R. E. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How to Respond to Disruptive Innovation in Online Retail Platforms;Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity;2022-07-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3