Assessing Digital Literacy in Web-Based Physical Activity Surveillance: The WIN Study

Author:

Mathew Merly1,Morrow James R.1,Frierson Georita M.1,Bain Tyson M.1

Affiliation:

1. Merly Mathew, MPH, CHES, and James R. Morrow Jr, PhD, are with the Cooper Institute, Dallas, Texas. Dr. Morrow is also with the University of North Texas, Denton, Texas. Georita M. Frierson, PhD, is with the Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas. Tyson M. Bain, MS, is with the Institute for Health Care Research and Improvement, Baylor Health Care System, Dallas, Texas

Abstract

Purpose. Investigate relations between demographic characteristics and submission method, Internet or paper, when physical activity behaviors are reported. Design. Observational. Setting. Metropolitan. Subjects. Adult women (N = 918) observed weekly for 2 years (total number of weekly reports, 44,963). Measures. Independent variables included age, race, education, income, employment status, and Internet skills. Dependent variables were method of submission (Internet or paper) and adherence. Analysis. Logistic regression to analyze weekly odds of submitting data online and meeting study adherence criteria. Model 1 investigated method of submission, model 2 analyzed meeting study's Internet adherence, and model 3 analyzed meeting total adherence regardless of submission method. Results. Whites, those with good Internet skills, and those reporting higher incomes were more likely to log online. Those who were white, older, and reported good Internet skills were more likely to be at least 75% adherent online. Older women were more likely to be adherent regardless of method. Employed women were less likely to log online or be adherent. Conclusion. Providing participants with multiple submission methods may reduce potential bias and provide more generalizable results relevant for future Internet-based research.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health (social science)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3