Affiliation:
1. Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Abstract
Relevance. The complex, multi-stage surgical procedure aimed for replacing missing teeth often results in a deficiency of attached keratinized gingiva (AKG) in the intervened area. Despite numerous methods available for soft tissue volume and esthetics reconstruction, only a few demonstrate considerable long-term stability post-surgery. The quest to address this intricate issue has led to the combined utilization of autografts and xenografts Consequently, there is a need to evaluate the tissue structure obtained through this synergy via histological and immunohistochemical examination of the oral mucosa in the reconstructed region.Materials and methods. This study involved analyzing 87 biopsies of oral mucosa obtained from 57 patients aged 28 to 59 years who had undergone previous soft tissue volume and esthetics reconstruction in the AKG zone. Histological and immunohistochemical examinations were conducted on these biopsies, collected six weeks post soft tissue operation. A section of oral mucosa from the hard palate served as the reference sample.Results. The epithelial structure in the examined groups exhibited a well-defined basal layer with a continuous structure comprising two layers of cells without notable atypia, indicating a high cell proliferation capability. Immunohistochemical analysis targeting protein molecules revealed an absence of inflammation. The expression results of the Ki-67 antigen suggested the preservation of cell proliferation capacity and, consequently, the maintenance of tissue regenerative potential at a high level during the remote postoperative period, up to six weeks.Conclusion. This research showcases the efficacy of employing a combination of autografts and xenografts, a conclusion drawn from comprehensive histological and immunohistochemical analyses. Consequently, this approach presents a promising and innovative alternative to conventional methods for soft tissue volume and esthetics reconstruction.
Publisher
Periodontal Association - RPA
Reference19 articles.
1. Urban I, Nagy K, Werner S, Meyer M. Evaluation of the combination of strip gingival grafts and a xenogeneic collagen matrix for the treatment of severe mucogingival defects: a human histologic study. The International journal of periodontics and restorative dentistry. 2019;39(1):9-14. doi: 10.11607/prd.3921
2. Sedyh PN, Mammaev TZ, Aleksandrova MA. Sedykh MON, Mamaev TK, Alexandrova MA. Peri-implantitis: causes and methods of surgical treatment. Byulleten' medicinskih Internet-konferencij: elektronnyj zhurnal. 2018;8(7):292–293 (In Russ.). Available from: http://medconfer.com/files/archive/Bulletin-of-MIC-2018-07.pdf
3. Petrunyak VI, Beskova YUV, Zubareva AS, Hohrin VO. Risk factors for complications at various stages of dental implantation. Universitetskaya medicina Urala. 2021;7(2):23–25 (In Russ.). Available from: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_46297460_22300240.pdf
4. Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, McGuire M, Rasperini, G, Feinberg SE, Wang H L. Autogenous soft tissue grafting for periodontal and peri-implant plastic surgical reconstruction. Journal of periodontology. 2020;91(1):9-16. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0350
5. Thoma DS, Naenni N, Figuero E, Hämmerle CHF, Schwarz F, Jung RE. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical oral implants research. 2018;29(15):32–49. doi: 10.1111/clr.13114.