How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: data extraction, risk of bias, and transferability (part 3/3)-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: data extraction, risk of bias, and transferability (part 3/3)

Published:2016-10-21 Issue:6 Volume:16 Page:723-732
ISSN:1473-7167
Container-title:Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research

Author:

Wijnen BFM¹²,Van Mastrigt GAPG¹,Redekop WK³,Majoie HJM²⁴⁵⁶,De Kinderen RJA¹,Evers SMAA¹⁷

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI School of Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

2. Department of Research and Development, Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe, Heeze, The Netherlands

3. Department of Health Policy and Management, Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

4. Department of Neurology, Academic Centre for Epileptology, Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe and Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands

5. School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands

6. School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

7. Department for Economic Evaluations, Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Funder

the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development

Dutch Society of Medical Specialists,

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Health Policy,General Medicine

Link

https://tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14737167.2016.1246961

Reference39 articles.

1. How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: a five-step approach (part 1/3)

2. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project

3. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care

4. cancer, C.p.a. AGREE II domains, items, examples and resources. [cited 2016 02 19]. Available from: http://www.cancerview.ca/cv/portal/Home/TreatmentAndSupport/TSProfessionals/ClinicalGuidelines/GRCMain/GRCAGREEII/GRCAGREEIIDomain3Rigour?_afrLoop=7202305453745000&jsessionid=24h456yAq7d254qi0ILI7VsmaXiA_PrK-x3k9VkKOzLOzM5cClFs%21-1278458346&lang=en&_afrWindowMode=0&_adf.ctrl-state=y4y9grh4m_4

Cited by 142 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Economic evaluations of eHealth interventions targeting mental health problems in the workplace: a systematic review;Journal of Mental Health;2024-08-20

2. Economic burden of suicides and suicide attempts in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of costing studies;Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research;2024-08-13

3. Economic Evaluations of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapies for Hematologic and Solid Malignancies: A Systematic Review;Value in Health;2024-08

4. Behaviour change interventions to improve physical activity in adults: a systematic review of economic evaluations;International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity;2024-07-09

5. Health-Economic Evaluation of Psychological Interventions for Anxiety Prevention: A Systematic Review;Psychiatric Services;2024-07-01