Author:
Bacon Andrew,Hawthorne John,Uzquiano Gabriel
Abstract
AbstractThe principle of universal instantiation plays a pivotal role both in the derivation of intensional paradoxes such as Prior's paradox and Kaplan's paradox and the debate between necessitism and contingentism. We outline a distinctively free logical approach to the intensional paradoxes and note how the free logical outlook allows one to distinguish two different, though allied themes in higher-order necessitism. We examine the costs of this solution and compare it with the more familiar ramificationist approaches to higher-order logic. Our assessment of both approaches is largely pessimistic, and we remain reluctantly inclined to take Prior's and Kaplan's derivations at face value.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Primitivism;Truth Without Truths;2024-10-10
2. Inconsistency theories;Truth Without Truths;2024-10-10
3. Further objections to nihilism;Truth Without Truths;2024-10-10
4. Truth in philosophy;Truth Without Truths;2024-10-10
5. Conclusion;Truth Without Truths;2024-10-10