1. Bar nes, D. & Hampson, P. J. (1997). Connectionist models of arbitrarily applicable relational responding: A possible role for the hippocampal system. In J. Donahoe & V. P. Dorsel (Eds.) Neural-network models of cognition (pp. 496–521). North-Holland: Elsevier.
2. Barnes, D., Smeets, P. M. & Leader, G. (1996). Procedures for generating emergent matching performances: Implications for stimulus equivalence. In T. R. Zentall and P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 153–171). Holland: Elsevier.
3. Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2001). Analyzing relational frames: Studying language and cognition in young children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, National University of Ireland, Maynooth.
4. Gomez, S., Barnes-Holmes, D. & Luciano, M. C. (in press). Generalized break equivalence II: Contextual control over a generalized pattern of stimulus relations. The Psychological Record.
5. Hayes, L. J. (1992). Equivalence as process. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding Verbal Relations (pp. 97–108). Reno, NV: Context Press.