Intergovernmental Relation (IGR) In Korea and Japan: Phases, Patterns, and Progress Toward Decentralization (Local Autonomy) in A Trans-Pacific Context-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Intergovernmental Relation (IGR) In Korea and Japan: Phases, Patterns, and Progress Toward Decentralization (Local Autonomy) in A Trans-Pacific Context

Published:2004-07 Issue:1 Volume:9 Page:1-22
ISSN:1229-4659
Container-title:International Review of Public Administration
language:en
Short-container-title:International Review of Public Administration

Author:

Choi Yoo-Sung,Wright Deil S.

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Public Administration

Link

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/12294659.2004.10805035

Reference37 articles.

1. Akizuki, Kengo. 2001. Controlled Decentralization: Local Governments and the Ministry of Home Affairs in Japan. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. (May).

2. Anderson, William. 1960.Intergovernmental Relations in Review. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

3. Bulpitt, Jim. 1983.Territory and Power in the United Kingdom: An Interpretation. Manchester, UK: Manchester Univ. Press.

4. Cho, Chang-Hyun. 1997.The Development of Local Self-Government in Korea: An Overview of Legislative and Electoral Processes, ed.

5. Choy Jon. 1996. Local Government in Japan: The Next People – Power Revolution?JEI Report, 43 (November 15)

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Urban entrepreneurialism 3.0 and the export of urban expertise: The case of South Korea’s international information and telecommunication technology program;Competition & Change;2023-04-26

2. Inter-governmental relations and procurement non-compliance in African local government systems;Journal of Public Procurement;2019-11-04

3. Does the longer tenure of local government heads affect the performance of local governments? The Korean case;Asian Journal of Political Science;2019-01-02

4. Commitment to local autonomy in non-democracies: Russia and China compared;Constitutional Political Economy;2014-12-06

5. A Comparative Measure of Decentralization for Southeast Asia;Journal of East Asian Studies;2014-04