Is Distinction Impossible?: Comparing Risks between Radioactive Waste Facilities and Nuclear Power Stations
-
Published:2009-05
Issue:1
Volume:14
Page:67-84
-
ISSN:1229-4659
-
Container-title:International Review of Public Administration
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:International Review of Public Administration
Author:
Kim Seoyong,Cho Seongeun
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Subject
Public Administration
Reference13 articles.
1. Brody, J. G. and Fleishman, J. K. 1993. Sources of Public Concern About Nuclear Waste Disposal in Texas Agricultural Communities. InPublic Reactions to Nuclear Waste. Edited by R. E. Dunlap, M. E. Kraft and E. A. Rosa. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 2. Desvousges, W. H., Kunreuther, H., Slovic, P. and Rosa, E. 1993. Perceived Risk and Attitudes Toward Nuclear Wastes: National and Nevada Perspective. InPublic Reactions to Nuclear Waste.Edited by R. E. Dunlap, M. E. Kraft and E. A. Rosa. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 3. Dunlap, R., Rosa, E. A., Baxter, R. K. and Mitchell, R. C. 1993. Local Attitudes Toward Siting a High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository at Hanford, Washington. InPublic Reactions to Nuclear Waste. Edited by R. E. Dunlap, M. E. Kraft and E. A. Rosa. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 4. Gregory, R., Flynn, J. and Slovic, P. 1995. Technological Stigma.American Scientists, 83(3): 220–223. 5. Krannich, R. S., Little, R. L. and Cramer, L. A. 1993. Rural Community Residents’ Views of Nuclear Waste Repository Siting in Nevada. InPublic Reactions to Nuclear Waste, edited by R. E. Dunlap, M. E. Kraft and E. A. Rosa. Durham: Duke University Press.
|
|