A defeasible reasoning framework for human mental workload representation and assessment-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A defeasible reasoning framework for human mental workload representation and assessment

Published:2015-03-09 Issue:8 Volume:34 Page:758-786
ISSN:0144-929X
Container-title:Behaviour & Information Technology
language:en
Short-container-title:Behaviour & Information Technology

Author:

Longo Luca

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Human-Computer Interaction,General Social Sciences,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology

Link

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0144929X.2015.1015166

Reference61 articles.

1. Subjective rating scales in ergonomics: a reply

2. On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state

3. An introduction to argumentation semantics

4. Baroni, P., G. Guida, and S. Mussi. 1997. “Full Nonmonotonicity: A New Perspective in Defeasible Reasoning.” ESIT 97, European Symposium on Intelligent Techniques, 58–62.

5. A taxonomy of argumentation models used for knowledge representation

Cited by 47 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Granular estimation of user cognitive workload using multi-modal physiological sensors;Frontiers in Neuroergonomics;2024-02-27

2. Cognitive workload estimation using physiological measures: a review;Cognitive Neurodynamics;2023-12-26

3. Mental Workload and Human-Robot Interaction in Collaborative Tasks: A Scoping Review;International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction;2023-09-20

4. Development and validation of a task load index for process control room operators (PCRO-TLX);Ergonomics;2023-03-08

5. Comparing and extending the use of defeasible argumentation with quantitative data in real-world contexts;Information Fusion;2023-01