Randomized intervention trial on preventive home visits to older people: Baseline and follow-up characteristics of participants and non-participants

Author:

Vass Mikkel1,Avlund Kirsten2,Hendriksen Carsten3

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Practice and Central Research Unit for General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark,

2. Department of Social Medicine, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark,

3. Department of Social Medicine, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract

Aims: In controlled intervention studies, a selective non-response or refusal to participate at baseline may bias measurable effects of the intervention. The aim of this study was to compare mortality and nursing home admission among older persons who accepted (participants) and older person who declined (non-participants) to join a controlled feasibility trial, and to describe and evaluate defined subgroups of non-participants. Methods: Prospective controlled three-year intervention study (1999—2001) in 34 Danish municipalities with five-year follow-up. Randomization and intervention (education of municipality employees) was done at municipality level. In total 5,788 home-dwelling 75- and 80-year-olds living in these municipalities were invited to participate in the study. Written consent was obtained from 4,060 persons (participation rate 71%). Results: During five-year follow-up non-participants had a higher mortality rate (survival analysis risk ratio RR=1.5, 95% CI=1.3—1.7, p<0.0001) and a higher rate of nursing home admissions (RR=1.7, 95% CI=1.3— 2.1, p<0.0001) compared with participants. Subgroups of non-participants describing themselves as ``too ill'' and persons ``not reached'' had a significantly higher mortality rate and risk of admission to nursing home than participants, whereas the subgroups of non-participants describing themselves as ``too healthy'' and having ``another reason for refusal'' did not differ from the participants. There was no difference in mortality rates between non-participants living in intervention municipalities compared with non-participants living in control municipalities. Conclusions: Mortality and nursing home admissions were higher among non-participants. Selection participation bias was of no clinical importance since subgroups of non-participants eligible for the intervention did not differ from the participants.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3