ChatGPT as an “author”: Bibliometric analysis to assess the validity of authorship-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

ChatGPT as an “author”: Bibliometric analysis to assess the validity of authorship

Published:2024-05 Issue: Volume: Page:1-11
ISSN:0898-9621
Container-title:Accountability in Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Accountability in Research

Author:

Nazarovets Serhii¹,Teixeira da Silva Jaime A.²

Affiliation:

1. Library, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University, Kyiv, Ukraine

2. Independent researcher, Kagawa-ken, Japan

Funder

no funding associated with the work featured

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/08989621.2024.2345713

Reference30 articles.

1. Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia‐based paper mill

2. AI tools can improve equity in science

3. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering. 2024. “Submission guidelines.” Accessed April 8 2024. https://link.springer.com/journal/12195/submission-guidelines.

4. The raw truth about paper mills

5. COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics). 2024. “Authorship and AI Tools.” Accessed April 8 2024. https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Did ChatGPT ask or agree to be a (co)author? ChatGPT authorship reflects the wider problem of inappropriate authorship practices;Science Editing;2024-07-04

2. Exploring University Students’ Adoption of ChatGPT Using the Diffusion of Innovation Theory and Sentiment Analysis With Gender Dimension;Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies;2024-01

3. The Detection of ChatGPT’s Textual Crumb Trails is an Unsustainable Solution to Imperfect Detection Methods;Open Information Science;2024-01-01