The blocking effect in associative learning involves learned biases in rapid attentional capture

Author:

Luque David12ORCID,Vadillo Miguel A.34,Gutiérrez-Cobo María J.2,Le Pelley Mike E.1

Affiliation:

1. School of Psychology, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia

2. Department of Basic Psychology, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain

3. Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK

4. Department of Primary Care and Public Health Science, King’s College London, London, UK

Abstract

Blocking refers to the finding that less is learned about the relationship between a stimulus and an outcome if pairings are conducted in the presence of a second stimulus that has previously been established as a reliable predictor of that outcome. Attentional models of associative learning suggest that blocking reflects a reduction in the attention paid to the blocked cue. We tested this idea in three experiments in which participants were trained in an associative learning task using a blocking procedure. Attention to stimuli was measured 250 ms after onset using an adapted version of the dot probe task. This task was presented at the beginning of each learning trial (Experiments 1 and 2) or in independent trials (Experiment 3). Results show evidence of reduced attention to blocked stimuli (i.e. “attentional blocking”). In addition, this attentional bias correlated with the magnitude of blocking in associative learning, as measured by predictive-value judgments. Moreover, Experiments 2 and 3 found evidence of an influence of learning about predictiveness on memory for episodes involving stimuli. These findings are consistent with a central role of learned attentional biases in producing the blocking effect, and in the encoding of new memories.

Funder

Consejería de Economía, Innovación, Ciencia y Empleo, Junta de Andalucía

Australian Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Physiology (medical),General Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,General Medicine,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology,Physiology

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The role of selection history in the learned predictiveness effect.;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance;2024-10

2. Forward and backward blocking in statistical learning;PLOS ONE;2024-08-05

3. Statistical learning is not error-driven;2022-02-10

4. Uncertainty and predictiveness modulate attention in human predictive learning.;Journal of Experimental Psychology: General;2021-06

5. Hearing hooves, thinking zebras: A review of the inverse base-rate effect;Psychonomic Bulletin & Review;2021-02-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3