Forensic strength of evidence statements should preferably be likelihood ratios calculated using relevant data, quantitative measurements, and statistical models – a response to Lennard (2013) Fingerprint identification: how far have we come?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Forensic strength of evidence statements should preferably be likelihood ratios calculated using relevant data, quantitative measurements, and statistical models – a response to Lennard (2013) Fingerprint identification: how far have we come?

Published:2013-09-02 Issue:3 Volume:46 Page:282-292
ISSN:0045-0618
Container-title:Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences
language:en
Short-container-title:Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences

Author:

Morrison Geoffrey Stewart,Stoel Reinoud D.

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Link

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00450618.2013.833648

Reference27 articles.

1. Fingerprint identification: how far have we come?

2. Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists

3. Towards a uniform framework for reporting opinions in forensic science casework

4. The Likelihood-Ratio Framework and Forensic Evidence in Court: A Response to R v T

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. From specific-source feature-based to common-source score-based likelihood-ratio systems: ranking the stars;Law, Probability and Risk;2023-01-01

2. The opacity myth: A response to Swofford & Champod (2022);Forensic Science International: Synergy;2022

3. Advancing a paradigm shift in evaluation of forensic evidence: The rise of forensic data science;Forensic Science International: Synergy;2022

4. Testing for calibration discrepancy of reported likelihood ratios in forensic science;Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society);2021-09-15

5. The application of Gammatone frequency cepstral coefficients for forensic voice comparison under noisy conditions;Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences;2019-03-28