The uniform evidence act and Australian judges ability to assess properly the validity and reliability of expert evidence-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The uniform evidence act and Australian judges ability to assess properly the validity and reliability of expert evidence

Published:2020-04-20 Issue:3 Volume:52 Page:243-245
ISSN:0045-0618
Container-title:Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences
language:en
Short-container-title:Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences

Author:

Cordner Stephen¹,Bruenisholz Eva²,Catoggio Dean³^ORCID,Chadwick Peter⁴,Champion John⁵,Davey Anna⁶,Kogios Rebecca⁷,Williams Michele⁸,Woodford Noel⁹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

2. ICRC Forensic Specialist, Jakarta, Indonesia

3. National Institute of Forensic Science, Melbourne, Australia

4. Victorian Bar, Melbourne, Australia

5. Supreme Court of Victoria, Melbourne, Australia

6. Forensic Foundations, Melbourne, Australia

7. Forensic Services Department, Victoria Police, Docklands, Australia

8. Post Sentence Authority, Melbourne, Australia

9. Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, Southbank, Australia

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00450618.2020.1741762

Reference5 articles.

1. National Research Council (USA). Committee on identifying the needs of the forensic science community. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: A path forward. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009; p. 8, 107.

2. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science; 2020 January. www.nist.gov/forensics/organization-scientific-area-committees-forensic-science.

3. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Report to the President. Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-Comparison Methods; 2016 Sep 22.

4. House of Lords. Science and technology committee. 3rd report of session 2017–19. Forensic science and the criminal justice system – a blueprint for change. HL Paper 333; 2019 May.

5. IMM v The Queen. HCA 14; 2016.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Forensic science in the justice system: learnings from the Queensland DNA inquiry;Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences;2024-06-24

2. EEG Lie Detection Evidence and Potential Australian Jurors;Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology;2024-04-17

3. The Eastman transcripts: A case study calling Australian linguists to action against legal misconceptions about language in forensic evidence;Australian Journal of Linguistics;2023-10-02