In EPAs we trust, is quality and safety a must? A cross-specialty analysis of entrustable professional activity guides-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

In EPAs we trust, is quality and safety a must? A cross-specialty analysis of entrustable professional activity guides

Published:2024-03-25 Issue: Volume: Page:1-9
ISSN:0142-159X
Container-title:Medical Teacher
language:en
Short-container-title:Medical Teacher

Author:

Brown Allison¹,La Julie²³,Keri McNiel-Inyani¹,Hillis Chris⁴,Razack Saleem⁵,Korah Nadine⁶,Karpinski Jolanta⁷,Frank Jason R.⁷,Wong Brian⁸⁹,Goldman Joanne⁸⁹

Affiliation:

1. Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

2. Graduate Program in Health Quality, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada

3. Department of Surgery, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada

4. Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

5. Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada

6. Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

7. Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

8. Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Toronto, Canada

9. Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto Temerty, Toronto, Canada

Funder

Office of Health and Medical Education Scholarship (OHMES) at the University of Calgary

This work was funded by the Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2323177

Reference41 articles.

1. Embracing standardisation and contextualisation in medical education

2. Not wanted on the voyage: highlighting intrinsic CanMEDS gaps in Competence by Design curricula

3. Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method

4. A Tale of Four Programs: How Residents Learn About Quality Improvement during Postgraduate Medical Education at the University of Calgary

5. A realist synthesis of quality improvement curricula in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: what works, for whom, and in what contexts?