A New Method for Identifying Low-Quality Data in Perceived Usability Crowdsourcing Tests: Differences in Questionnaire Scores-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A New Method for Identifying Low-Quality Data in Perceived Usability Crowdsourcing Tests: Differences in Questionnaire Scores

Published:2023-10-09 Issue: Volume: Page:1-17
ISSN:1044-7318
Container-title:International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
language:en
Short-container-title:International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction

Author:

Wang Yuhui¹,Chen Xuan¹,Zhou Xuan¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Industrial Design, School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha, China

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Human-Computer Interaction,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10447318.2023.2263694

Reference113 articles.

1. Albert, W., & Tullis, T. (2013). Measuring the user experience. China Machine Press.

2. Comparing Two Methods of Usability Testing in Saudi Arabia: Concurrent Think-Aloud vs. Co-Discovery

3. A Comparison of Synchronous and Asynchronous Remote Usability Testing Methods

4. Alharbi, A., & Mayhew, P. (2015). Users’ performance in lab and non-lab enviornments through online usability testing: A case of evaluating the usability of digital academic libraries’ websites [Paper presentation]. Paper Presented at the Science & Information Conference.

5. Quality Control in Crowdsourcing Systems: Issues and Directions

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Using animation to develop a usability questionnaire: Scale development and psychological measurements;International Journal of Human-Computer Studies;2024-07