1. Schick, F. (2005) Whole-body mri at high field: technical limits and clinical potential European Radiology, 15, pp. 946 - 59. [CSA]
2. Schmitt, F and Grosu, D and Mohr, C and Purdy, D and Salem, K and Scott, K and Stoeckel, B. (2004) 3 tesla MRI: successful results with higher field strengths Radiologe, 44, pp. 31 - 48. [INFOTRIEVE][CSA][CROSSREF]
3. Dougherty, L and Connick, T and Mizsei, G. (2001) Cardiac imaging at 4 tesla Magnetic Resonance In Medicine, 45, pp. 176 - 8. [INFOTRIEVE][CSA][CROSSREF]
4. Gutberlet, M and Schwinge, K and Freyhardt, P and Spors, B and Grothoff, M and Denecke, T and Ludemann, L and Noeske, R and Niendorf, T and Felix, R. (2005) Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2d cine magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 t vs 3.0 t Eur Radiol, 15, pp. 1586 - 97. [INFOTRIEVE][CSA][CROSSREF]
5. Gutberlet, M and Spors, B and Grothoff, M and Freyhardt, P and Schwinge, K and Plotkin, M and Amthauer, H and Noeske, R and Felix, R. (2004) Comparison of different cardiac mri sequences at 1.5 T/3.0 T with respect to signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios initial experience Rofo-Fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren, 176, pp. 801 - 8. [CSA][CROSSREF]