MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography versus helical CT in the evaluation of patients with suspected periampullary tumors: a prospective comparative study
-
Published:2005-02
Issue:1
Volume:46
Page:16-27
-
ISSN:0284-1851
-
Container-title:Acta Radiologica
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Acta Radiol
Author:
Andersson M.1, Kostic S.1, Johansson M.1, Lundell L.1, Asztély M.1, Hellström M.1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Radiology and Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, the Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
Abstract
Purpose: To establish the diagnostic accuracy of MRI including MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared with helical CT in the differentiation of malignant and benign lesions in the periampullary region. Material and Methods: Fifty‐one patients (27 M, 24 F, mean age 66 years, range 39–86 years) with obstructive jaundice and sonographic evidence of intra‐ and extrahepatic bile duct dilatation ( n = 31) or suspicion of periampullary tumor, based on previously performed ultrasound and/or CT examination ( n = 20), were studied. MRI with MRCP and helical CT were reviewed blindly under standardized conditions. Lesion status (differentiation of malignant versus benign) was rated on a 5‐point diagnostic confidence scale. Reference standards for comparison were findings at surgery or laparoscopy and/or the clinical outcome. The predictive value of imaging findings was determined with multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.96 for MRI with MRCP and 0.81 for CT ( P<0.05). Multivariate analysis of eight imaging variables at MRI indicated that a stricture with malignant characteristics at MRCP was the best predictor of malignancy. Conclusion: MRI with MRCP was significantly more accurate than CT in differentiating between malignant and benign lesions in patients with suspected periampullary tumors, mainly due to the information obtained on the MRCP images of the biliary and pancreatic duct anatomy.
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Subject
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Reference30 articles.
1. Adamek, H. E, Albert, J, Breer, H, Weitz, M, Schilling, D, Riemann, J. F. Pancreatic cancer detection with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective controlled study. Lancet, 2000; 356: 190–3 2. Bluemke, D. A, Cameron, J. L, Hruban, R. A, Pitt, H. A, Siegelman, S. S, Soyer, P, et al, . Potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: spiral CT assessment with surgical and pathologic correlation. Radiology, 1995; 197: 381–5 3. Boland, G. W, O'Malley, M. E, Saez, M, Fernandez‐del‐Castillo, C, Warshaw, A. L, Mueller, P. R. Pancreatic‐phase versus portal vein‐phase helical CT of the pancreas: optimal temporal window for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Roentgenol, 1999; 172: 605–8 4. Chen, C. H, Tseng, L. J, Yang, C. C, Yeh, Y. H. Preoperative evaluation of periampullary tumors by endoscopic sonography, transabdominal ultrasonography, and computed tomography. J Clin Ultrasound, 2001; 29: 313–21 5. Freeny, P. C, Traverso, L. W, Ryan, J. A. Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with dynamic computed tomography. Am J Surg, 1993; 165: 600–6
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|