Prospective study of pain levels when using controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal delivery system (PROPESS) compared with mechanical methods in pregnant women requiring cervical ripening-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Prospective study of pain levels when using controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal delivery system (PROPESS) compared with mechanical methods in pregnant women requiring cervical ripening

Published:2024 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:2187-5987
Container-title:Hypertension Research in Pregnancy
language:en
Short-container-title:Hypertens Res Pregnancy

Author:

Haruna Yuria¹,Suzuki Shunji¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital

Publisher

Japan Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy

Link

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsshp/advpub/0/advpub_HRP2024-005/_pdf

Reference18 articles.

1. 1. Itoh H, Ishii K, Shigeta N, et al. Efficacy and safety of controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal delivery system (PROPESS) in Japanese pregnant women requiring cervical ripening: Results from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021; 47: 216–225.

2. 2. Yamaguchi M, Takakura S, Enomoto N, et al. Comparison of perinatal outcomes between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal delivery system (PROPESS) and metreurynter for cervical ripening in labor induction: A retrospective single-center study in Japan. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021; 47: 4256–4262.

3. 3. Shibata Y, Yokoyama N, Suzuki S. A retrospective comparative study of the effect of Controlled-Release Dinoprostone Vaginal Delivery System (Propess®) and mechanical methods for cervical ripening in nulliparous women in late-term pregnancy. Cureus. 2023; 15: e47255.

4. 4. de Vaan MD, Ten Eikelder ML, Jozwiak M, et al. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 3: CD001233.

5. 5. Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, et al. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008; 101: 17–24.