Qualitative evaluation of an educational intervention about healthcare improvement for nursing students

Author:

Sierras-Davó María Cristina1ORCID,Lillo-Crespo Manuel1ORCID,Verdú Rodríguez Patricia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidad de Alicante

Abstract

Objective: To explore the meaning of the experience and knowledge acquired by nursing students trained in healthcare improvement. Material and methods: A phenomenological approach based on the Giorgi method was made through a group discussion of 21 European students from four countries in July 2019. The data was triangulated with the testimonies of key informants and with the use of an evaluation tool specific to this topic. The analysis was also triangulated with three experienced researchers who reduced the data by consensus to eight units of meaning. Results: Nursing empowerment and horizontal health organizations were two of the most recurrent units of meaning along with professional values such as teamwork and humanization of care. Conclusions: The knowledge, attitudes and values acquired are evidence of the shortcomings in the training of future nursing professionals in Europe. The theoretical and practical approach of the sessions, as well as the mixture of cultures, were strengths for the students. It is necessary to follow up on more cases that show the return on the training investment in substantial improvements in real contexts and its impact on the quality of care.

Publisher

Universidad de la Sabana

Subject

General Nursing

Reference27 articles.

1. Institute for Healthcare Improvement.Timeline. [Internet] [citado 2020 abr 25]. Disponible en: http://www.ihi.org/about/Documents/IHI_Timeline_2018.pdf

2. Skela-Savič B, Macrae R, Lillo-Crespo M, Rooney K D. The development of a consensus definition for healthcare improvement science (HIS) in seven European countries: a consensus methods approach. SJPH. 2017;56(2): 82-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sjph-2017-0011

3. World Health Organization. A brief synopsis on patient safety [Internet]. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2010 [citado 2020 en 21]. Disponible en: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/111507/E93833.pdf?ua=1

4. World Health Organization. Patient Safety [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2019 [citado 2020 ene 21]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/patient-safety

5. Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico​ (OECD). The Economics of Patient Safety in Primary and Ambulatory Care [Internet]. Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico; 2018. [citado 2020 ene 21]. Disponible en: https://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/The-Economics-of-Patient-Safety-in-Primary-and-Ambulatory-Care-April2018.pdf

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3