Use of Decision-Analytic Modelling to Assess the Cost-Effectiveness of Diagnostic Imaging of the Spine, Shoulder, and Knee: A Scoping Review-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Use of Decision-Analytic Modelling to Assess the Cost-Effectiveness of Diagnostic Imaging of the Spine, Shoulder, and Knee: A Scoping Review

Published:2023-03-20 Issue:3 Volume:21 Page:467-475
ISSN:1175-5652
Container-title:Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
language:en
Short-container-title:Appl Health Econ Health Policy

Author:

Docking Sean^ORCID,Gao Lan^ORCID,Ademi Zanfina^ORCID,Bonello Christian,Buchbinder Rachelle^ORCID

Funder

Monash University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Economics and Econometrics,General Medicine

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40258-023-00799-4.pdf

Reference66 articles.

1. Britt H, Miller GC, Valenti L, et al. Evaluation of imaging ordering by general practitioners in Australia, 2002–03 to 2011–12. General practice series no. 35. Sydney: Sydney University Press; 2014.

2. Jenkins HJ, Downie AS, Maher CG, et al. Imaging for low back pain: is clinical use consistent with guidelines? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 2018;18:2266–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.004.

3. O’Sullivan JW, Albasri A, Nicholson BD, et al. Overtesting and undertesting in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2018;8: e018557. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018557.

4. Demehri S, Recht MP, Lee CI. Comparative effectiveness research in musculoskeletal imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2017;21:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1597250.

5. di Ruffano LF, Dinnes J, Sitch AJ, et al. Test-treatment RCTs are susceptible to bias: a review of the methodological quality of randomized trials that evaluate diagnostic tests. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0287-z.