Abstract
Abstract
Introduction and Hypothesis
The objective was to create and validate the usefulness of a convolutional neural network (CNN) for identifying different organs of the pelvic floor in the midsagittal plane via dynamic ultrasound.
Methods
This observational and prospective study included 110 patients. Transperineal ultrasound scans were performed by an expert sonographer of the pelvic floor. A video of each patient was made that captured the midsagittal plane of the pelvic floor at rest and the change in the pelvic structures during the Valsalva maneuver. After saving the captured videos, we manually labeled the different organs in each video. Three different architectures were tested—UNet, FPN, and LinkNet—to determine which CNN model best recognized anatomical structures. The best model was trained with the 86 cases for the number of epochs determined by the stop criterion via cross-validation. The Dice Similarity Index (DSI) was used for CNN validation.
Results
Eighty-six patients were included to train the CNN and 24 to test the CNN. After applying the trained CNN to the 24 test videos, we did not observe any failed segmentation. In fact, we obtained a DSI of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73 – 0.82) as the median of the 24 test videos. When we studied the organs independently, we observed differences in the DSI of each organ. The poorest DSIs were obtained in the bladder (0.71 [95% CI: 0.70 – 0.73]) and uterus (0.70 [95% CI: 0.68 – 0.74]), whereas the highest DSIs were obtained in the anus (0.81 [95% CI: 0.80 – 0.86]) and levator ani muscle (0.83 [95% CI: 0.82 – 0.83]).
Conclusions
Our results show that it is possible to apply deep learning using a trained CNN to identify different pelvic floor organs in the midsagittal plane via dynamic ultrasound.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. García-Mejido JA, Bonomi-Barby MJ, Armijo-Sanchez A, et al. Methodology for the transperineal ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Clin Invest Ginecol Obstet. 2020;48:190–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gine.2020.09.008.
2. Thyer I, Shek C, Dietz H. New imaging method for assessing pelvic floor biomechanics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(2):201–5.
3. Huang YL, Chen HY. Computer-aided diagnosis of urodynamic stress incontinence with vector-based perineal ultrasound using neural networks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:1002–6.
4. Van den Noort F, van der Vaart CH, Grob ATM, van de Waarsenburg MK, Slump CH, van Stralen M. Deep learning enables automatic quantitative assessment of puborectalis muscle and urogenital hiatus in plane of minimal hiatal dimensions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;54:270–5.
5. Bonmati E, Hu Y, Sindhwani N, et al. Automatic segmentation method of pelvic floor levator hiatus in ultrasound using a self-normalizing neural network. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018;5:021206.