Author:
Chow Yiu Fai,de Kloet Jeroen,Schmidt Leonie
Abstract
AbstractIn Hong Kong, despite its overwhelming capitalist logic, pop music makers have established a tradition of political engagement, stretching from the anxiety towards the 1997 Handover, the post-Tiananmen fury and fear, to the more recent articulations against increasing intervention of the Beijing regime. While previous chapters provide a textual analysis and explore the political engagement of Tat Ming Pair’s work—their songs, performances, and music videos—Chapter 5 will take a different approach by conducting a production analysis of Tat Ming’s 2012 and 2017 concerts. The concerts that took place in the Hong Kong Coliseum created a great buzz around the city of Hong Kong and were applauded for their political, musical, and aesthetic standards. This chapter zooms in on these concerts and asks: What considerations, negotiations, tensions, controversies, and compromises on the production side underpin the narratives and aesthetics of Tat Ming’s 2012 and 2017 concerts? As such, Chapter 5 aims to unpack the making of a political pop spectacle in a city that is struggling for its future. To do so, the chapter conducts a two-fold production analysis. First, the chapter builds on a discourse analysis of the reports that have emerged in different media platforms before, during, and after the concerts. Second, we will conduct interviews with Tatming and their close collaborators, ultimately reflecting on the tension between political motivations and commercial considerations, between engagement and entertainment. By drawing on John Corner’s (1999) levels of production, we will investigate how different makers and creative workers negotiate the tension between creating an appealing aesthetic spectacle on the one hand, while trying to convey a political message on the other hand. Our analysis distils three key discourses that we find salient and helpful in furthering our understanding of a concert production. We call them the contingent, the personal, and the calibrational. They recur in the narratives of the three producers and are interwoven through different levels of production.
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Reference24 articles.
1. Abell, Jackie, and Greg Myers. “Analyzing Research Interviews.” In Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michał Krzyżanowski, 145–59. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
2. Caldwell, John Thornton. Production Culture: Industrial Reflexivity and Critical Practice in Film and Television. Durham; N.C: Duke University Press, 2008.
3. Cheung, Esther Mei-Kwan. “The Return Trip: Sentiments of Home and Nation in Hong Kong Pop Music Since 1980s 回歸之旅: 八十年代以來香港流行曲中的家國情.” In The practice of emotions: The study on Hongkong pop song lyrics 情感的實踐: 香港流行歌詞研究, edited by Stephen Ching-Kiu Chan, 45–74. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1997.
4. Chow, Rey. “Between Colonizers: Hong Kong’s Postcolonial Self-Writing in the 1990s.” Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies 2, no. 2 (1992): 151–70. https://doi.org/10.1353/dsp.1992.0011.
5. Chow, Yiu Fai, Jeroen de Kloet, and Leonie Schmidt. “Reflections on Tatming Meeting George Orwell in 2017.” In Made in Hong Kong: Studies in Popular Music, edited by Anthony Y. H. Fung and Alice Chik, 168–80. London: Routledge, 2020.